Seattle Treatment Education Project (STEP) Perspective, Vol. 5, No. 2 - July 1993 * 127 Broadway E. Ste 200 Seattle, WA 98102
Joel Gibson, MS
However, some precautionary notes on this article should be addressed. First and foremost, the studies were done in vitro. Whether this effect will be seen in people is still very much up in the air. Second, since we are talking about RT inhibitors whether they are nucleosides or non- nucleosides, they are only effective in cells which have not been infected. Already infected cells will not be affected by this combination of drugs. Thirdly, since multiple sites of mutation are usually necessary for resistance to occur, couldn't other combinations of mutation sites still render the virus resistant to the drugs but not cause the RT enzyme to be knocked out? And fourth, if a mechanism is present such as stated in Larder's article about the reversal of AZT resistance by the development of resistance to some non-nucleoside RT inhibitors, wouldn't this eliminate this "convergent" effect which so effectively inactivated the RT enzyme in Chow's experiments? The answers to these questions will hopefully be answered in ACTG 241 and other like trials. The results of which are eagerly awaited.
For more complete information on convergent combination therapy, non- nucleoside RT inhibitors, ACTG 241, and associated planned trials, see one or both of the following well written articles:
* Loftus, R. Convergent Combination Therapy. March/April 1993. Treatment Issues 7(3):1-5.
* James, J.S. Convergent Combination Therapy. March 5, 1993. AIDS Treatment News 170:1-5.
9307
STEP5219
Copyright © 1993 - Seattle Treatment Education Project (STEP) - All rights reserved. Noncommercial reproduction is encouraged. STEP is published four times a year by the Seattle Treatment Education Project, 127 Broadway East, 3rd Floor, Seattle, WA 98102. Email: step100@aol.com STEP web page