Project Inform - March, 1997
| AIDS or death |
Death |
||||||
| All | <50 CD4+ | <50 CD4+ | All | <50 CD4+ | <50 CD4+ | ||
| AZT+3TC | 63 (18%) |
44 (34%) |
19 (9%) |
18 (5%) |
13 (9%) |
5 (2%) |
|
| AZT+3TC+ indinavir |
33 (9%) |
23 (16%) |
10 (4%) |
8 (2%) |
5 (3%) |
3 (1%) |
The outcome of this study surprised no one, since at the time it was initiated, other studies had already shown the superiority of the 3-drug regimen compared to 2-drug nucleoside combinations. The people receiving the 2-drug regimen were, in the view of many, doomed to an inferior outcome. The question is: why was such a study done? Many activists, researchers, physicians and even employees of the companies involved protested bitterly from the outset that this study would result in an earlier and higher death rate for those receiving AZT + 3TC. Supporters of the study, mostly the FDA and a few medical conservatives who somehow got their way, argued that the clinical and survival benefits of the 3-drug combination had not yet been proven in a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Technically, this is true, but irrelevant to anyone except those who refused to acknowledge earlier studies showing that the triple combination produced dramatically better and longer-lasting reductions in viral load and improved CD4+ counts. Other studies had already shown that improvements of this type were directly associated with major improvements in survival and delayed progression. Unable or unwilling to put the two types of studies together and draw reasonable conclusions, the study’s supporters pressed their demand for a body count before they would accept what had become obvious. In the end, the trial was halted when volunteers began leaving in droves and researchers were having nightly pangs of conscience as they saw the body count rise. A hastily called analysis reaffirmed what was already known about the superiority of the triple therapy and the study was halted, albeit with an excess of dead bodies and people who had progressed to AIDS.
Some of the brave but unwitting volunteers who participated paid the price with their lives, while others are left with perhaps irreversible immune suppression. In their honor, we must be certain that neither the FDA’s traditions nor the doubts of scientists who cannot reason will ever again be valued over lives of people. The time for studies whose outcome is measured in bodies is over in this epidemic. It has long been over.
970301
PI970304
©1997. This document is copyrighted by Project Inform, 205 13th Street, #2001, San Francisco, CA 94103. Treatment Hotline: 800-822-7422 (toll-free) or 415-558-9051 (in the San Francisco Bay Area and internationally) All Project Inform materials may be reprinted and/or distributed without prior permission. However, reprints may not be edited and must include the following text: "From Project Inform, for more information contact the Project Inform National HIV/AIDS Treatment Hotline, 800-822-7422." For permission to edit any Project Inform material for further publication, contact David Evans at the Project Inform office.
Project Inform, established in 1985 as a national, non profit, community-based HIV/AIDS treatment information and advocacy organization, serves HIV-infected individuals, their care-givers, and their healthcare and service providers through its national, toll-free treatment hotline, the PI Perspective and other information publications, educational Town Meetings, on-line services and research and drug access advocacy programs. All information is available free of charge; donations are strongly encouraged. For more information, contact the Project Inform National HIV/AIDS Treatment Hotline. Email: web@projinf.org; Website: http://www.projinf.org.
The original of this article can be found at http://www.projinf.org/pub/21/ACTG320.html