The HIV ReportImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in July 2006. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
click here to return to The HIV Report main menu
DonateNow

Summary of Changes: DHHS Guidelines for Use of Antiretroviral Agents May 4, 2006

Hopkins HIV Report 2006 Jul; 18(4):10

John G. Bartlett, M.D.
Johns Hopkins


The following is a summary of changes contained in the May 4, 2006 edition of the “DHHS Guidelines for the Use of Antiviral Agents in HIV-infected Adults and Adolescents.”

  1. Genotypic resistance testing is now recommended prior to initiation of antiretroviral therapy, and the results should influence the selection of the agents. An option is to obtain the resistance test earlier in the course of the infection for later use when treatment is to be started. The previous version of the guidelines recommended resistance testing only in patients who had been treated and had virologic failure. The change was prompted by three observations: First, there are reports that transmitted strains with resistant mutations persist for more prolonged periods than resistant strains that have evolved on non-suppressive therapy [Little SJ, et al. Conf Retroviruses Opportunistic Infect. 2004 Feb 8-11;11th: (abstract No. 36LB); Novak RM, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Feb 1;40(3):468-74]. For this reason, baseline testing in chronically infected persons may yield important information, although it is uncertain how long transmitted resistance persists. Second, some studies also show that patients with baseline resistance respond less well to initial treatment [Weinstock HS, et al. J Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 15;189(12):2174-80; Wensing Am, et al. J Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 15;192(6):958-66; Cane P, et al. BMJ. 2005 Dec 10;331(7529):1368; Saag MS, et al. JAMA. 2004 Jul 14;292(2):180-9; Gallant JE, N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 19;354(3):251-60]. Further, recent studies indicate that up to 16% of treatment-naïve patients have resistance mutations. Finally, there are also studies showing that baseline testing is cost-effective [Sax PE, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Nov 1;41(9):1316-23]. This recommendation received a score of BIII meaning moderate priority (B) but no randomized controlled trials to support the recommendation (III).
  2. The section on treatment interruption now states that treatment should be interrupted when it cannot be avoided, such as for surgery or serious adverse drug reactions. The prior document suggested that CD4-driven treatment interruption was an option, but recent clinical trials now indicate this strategy could be dangerous and needs more study. The Trivacan ANRS 1269 trial found that severe morbidity was significantly higher in the treatment interruption arm than in the continuous therapy arm at 24 months (17.6/100 patient-years vs. 6.7/100 patient-years; p=0.001) [Danel C, et al. Lancet. 2006 Jun 17;367(9527):1981-9]. The SMART trial, which was reviewed by Joel Gallant [HHR 2006;18(2):1], found that treatment interruption was associated with a statistically significant increase in HIV-related events, drug toxicities and deaths. Both trials used a study design that permitted drug discontinuation when the CD4 was >350/mm3 and re-initiation when the CD4 count was <250/mm3.
  3. The section on hepatitis B co-infection has been rewritten to state that: a) lamivudine (3TC), tenofovir (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) have activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV), and discontinuation of these drugs may cause a HBV flare; b) HBV resistance is about 40% when 3TC is used as a single agent against HBV; c) immune reconstitution may be associated with an increase in hepatic transaminases; d) patients with immune reconstitution may have loss of HBV early antigen (HBeAg) that is associated with a hepatitis flare; and e) administration of PIs and NNRTIs are associated with high rates of transaminase elevations in coinfected patients. The cause of the transaminase elevation is unclear, since they may decrease with continued therapy. Nevertheless, the common recommendation is to stop the implicated drug when the increase in AST or ALT is >5-10 times the upper limit of normal. For management of HIV/HBV-co-infected persons:

2006-07-10
HHR-2006-07-04


Copyright © 2006 - The Johns Hopkins University AIDS Service, Division of Infectious Diseases. Permission to use and reproduce portions of this newsletter is hereby granted provided that author and publication are fully credited and both copyright and permission notice appear with reprinted material. Inquiries may be directed to Sharon McAvinue, Managing Editor. Website: Johns Hopkins AIDS Service.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Roche and Trimeris, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2006. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2006. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content.