The HIV ReportImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in May 2002. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
click here to return to The HIV Report main menu
DonateNow
Update on Opportunistic Infections

John G. Bartlett, M.D.
The Hopkins HIV Report - May 2002


At present, discontinuation of primary prophylaxis for PCP, toxoplasmosis, and MAC after an adequate response to HAART is recommended as safe (AI recommendation) according to the 2001 USPHS/IDSA guidelines (available at http://www.hivatis.org). Secondary prophylaxis refers to the use of prophylactic agents to prevent a recurrence of disease once a patient has been adequately treated for the primary episode. Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis after an adequate response to HAART is supported by fewer data, and is a BII recommendation for PCP and a CIII recommendation for toxoplasmosis and MAC. Data presented at the 9th CROI lend support to discontinuing secondary prophylaxis after an adequate response to HAART, although recurrences of disease do occasionally occur.

Mussini and colleagues reported three relapses among 58 patients with cryptococcal meningitis when secondary prophylaxis was discontinued [Abstract 635-W]. However, scrutiny of the three cases showed that the etiologic diagnosis was based only on recurrence of cryptococcal antigen in serum, and others have concluded this antigen assay is not a good test for long term follow-up of cryptococcosis. Bertschy and co-workers reported a relapse of toxoplasmosis in one of 14 patients after secondary prophylaxis was discontinued [Abstract 633-W]. Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis for cryptococcosis and MAC after immune reconstitution also appears to be safe, although there are rare breakthroughs. Aberg reported results from ACTG 393, in which 48 patients discontinued secondary prophylaxis for MAC [Abstract 634-W]. There was one case (2%) of MAC osteomyelitis of the rib at 16 months in a patient with a CD4 count of 244 cells/mm3, which represents a recurrence but should probably be considered a manifestation of “the immune reconstitution syndrome.” Burman reported 24-month follow-up data on 520 patients with a median CD4 count of 261 cells/mm3 after a median nadir of 24 cells/mm3 [Abstract 631-W]. There were 17 deaths, but 12 were unrelated to HIV. One patient developed MAC bacteremia, but only after the CD4 count decreased to 21 cells/mm3.

Data continue to confirm that HAART-induced immune reconstitution leads to protection from OIs, with only occasional exceptions. Koletar and colleagues provided data on 643 patients who were followed for a median of 153 weeks after discontinuing MAC prophylaxis when the CD4 count increased from <50 to >250 cells/mm3 [Abstract 630-W]. The subsequent increase in CD4 count correlated with viral suppression: There was a median increase of 9 cells/mm3 every 8 weeks in patients with undetectable viral loads vs no change in patients with consistently detectable viral loads. There were 27 AIDS-defining events, including 10 in patients with CD4 counts >200 cells/mm3, 3 with presumed PCP, 2 with CMV, and 2 with cryptosporidiosis.

With rare exceptions, the results of these studies add to an already robust database that demonstrates that viral suppression and CD4 rebound substantially reduce the risk of HIV-associated complications.

20020501
JH20020505


©1997,1998,1999,2000,2001, 2002. The Johns Hopkins University AIDS Service, Division of Infectious Diseases. Permission to use and reproduce portions of this newsletter is hereby granted provided that author and publication are fully credited and both copyright and permission notice appear with reprinted material. Inquiries may be directed to Sharon McAvinue, Managing Editor. Website: Johns Hopkins AIDS Service.

AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, iMetrikus, Inc., the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2002. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2002. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content.