I-BASE HIV TREATMENT BULLETINImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in August 2007. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to I-BASE main menu
DonateNow

Boosting atazanavir in treatment-naïve patients, and impact on lipids after switching from lopinavir/r

HIV Treatment Bulletin - Vol. 8, No. 8/9, August-September 2007

Simon Collins, HIV i-Base


Although atazanavir/r is widely used in treatment-naïve patients, and widely used as a choice of switch drug in patients experiencing tolerability problems with efavirenz or lopinavir/r, there is limited data in naïve patients (and for whom it still not indicated in Europe).

Malan and colleagues presented 96 week results from the BMS-089 study comparing atazanavir 400mg QD to atazanavir 300mg QD boosted by 100mg ritonavir in approximately 200 treatment-naïve individuals. All patients received 3TC and the extended release once-daily d4T that never become commercially available. [1]

Confirming the US and European recommendations to use boosted atazanavir in treatment-experienced patients, virological suppression to <50 copies/mL was greater in the ATZ/r arm (TLOVR 65% vs 55%, difference estimate 9.8 (95% CI: -3.4 to 23.1). Virological failure occurred more frequently in the unboosted arm (in 20 vs 5 patients), with higher rates of resistance (M184V occurring in 11/20 vs 1/5 patients and I50I/L or N88N/S occurring in 5/20 and 1/5 patients in the unboosted and boosted arms respectively).

CD4 increases were higher in the unboosted arm (+315 vs +276 cells/mm3), though this difference was not statistically significant.

Greater increases in lipids occurred when ritonavir was used: total cholesterol increased by +0.18 vs +0.52 mmol/L (p<0.01); LDL by +0.36 vs +0.70 mmol/L (p<0.05); and HDL by +0.59 vs + 0.85 mmol/L (p=NS), in the ATZ and ATV/r arms respectively, but this generally occurred in the first 48 weeks of treatment. 48 week results from this study were presented at the 13th CROI in 2006.[2]

Horberg and colleagues from Kaiser Permanente presented results from a retrospective analysis of 443 patients using unboosted- (n=69) and boosted-atazanavir (n=374). [3]

All patients were treatment-naïve, and adherence was reported at approximately 80% for each group. Viral suppression to <400 copies/mL was 54% in the unboosted vs 78% in the boosted patients.

Elion and colleagues, presented results from a GSK study of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir plus abacavir/3TC in 111 treatment-naïve patients, half of whom had baseline CD4 counts <200 cellsmm3 and viral load >100,000 copies/mL. [4]

In this study, 87% patients reported viral suppression to <50 copies/mL at week 48. 16 subjects (14%) prematurely discontinued: lost to follow-up (5), consent withdrawal (5), adverse event (3), protocol violation (1), non-compliance (1), and virologic failure (1).

Further data on impact of the boosting ritonavir dose on lipids was presented by Mallola and colleagues from University Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, in virologically suppressed patients randomised to either continue on lopinavir/r (n=127) or switch to atazanavir/r (n=121).[5]

There were no significant differences in continued efficacy: treatment failure occurred in 20% vs 17% and virological failure occurred in 6.3% vs 5% in the LPV/r and ATV/r arms respectively. CD4 changes from baseline were similar in both arms (around 40 cells/mm3). Adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation was 5% in both arms and changes in ALT/ASTwere also similar.

While fasting cholesterol and triglyceride both reduced in the atazanavir/r arm by -9% and -29% (by -19 and -51 mg/dLrespectively) compared to no change in the LPV/r arm, neither HDL or LDL changes (both reduced, by -6% and -7% respectively) were reported as significantly improving.

While the percentage of patients above NCEP guidelines for lipid lowering treatment was higher for TC, TG and LDL in patients using LPV/r, the number of patients with HDL <40 mg/dL doubled from 16% to 32% in patients using ATV/r. See Table 1. The number of patients with LDLc >130 mg/dL even increased by +5% from 20% to 25% in the ATV/r arm (though by +10% in the LPV/r arm). Use of lipid lowering drugs did not significantly change during the study.

Table 1: Percentage above NCEP treatment recommended levels
  ATV/r
n=121
LPV/r
n=127
  BL Mo12 Change BL Mo12 Change
TG > 500mg/dL 3% 4% +1% 10% 17% +7%
TC > 240 mg/dL 23% 20% -3% 20% 26% +6%
LDL-c > 130 mg/dL 20% 25% +5% 20% 30% +10%
HDH-c <40 mg/dL 16% 32% +16% 21% 29% +8%

References

1. Malan N, Krantz E, David N et al. Efficacy and safety of atazanavir-based therapy in antiretroviral naïve HIV-1 infected subjects, both with and without ritonavir: 96-week results from AI424089. IAS Conf HIV Pathog Treat 2007 Jul 22-25;4th: (Abstract No. WEPEB024).
2. Malan N et al. Efficacy and Safety of Atazanavir-based Therapy in Antiretroviral Naïve HIV-1 Infected Subjects, Both with and without Ritonavir: 48-week Results from AI424-089, Conf Retroviruses Opportunistic Infect 2006 Feb 5-8;13: (Abstract no. 107LB).
3. Horberg M, Klein D, Hurley L et al. Efficacy and safety of non-boosted to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir among antiretroviral naïve patients. IAS Conf HIV Pathog Treat 2007 Jul 22-25;4th: (Abstract No. WEPEB025).
4. Elion R, DeJesus E, Sension M et al. Once-daily abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) and boosted atazanavir (ATV/RTV) in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1 infected subjects: 48-week results from COL102060 (SHARE). IAS Conf HIV Pathog Treat 2007 Jul 22-25;4th: (Abstract No. WEPEB033).
5. Mallolas J, Podzamczer D, Domingo P et al. Efficacy and safety of switching from lopinavir/r (LPV/r) to atazanavir/r (ATV/r) in patients with virologic suppression receiving a LPV/r containing HAART: the ATAZIP study. IAS Conf HIV Pathog Treat 2007 Jul 22-25;4th: (Abstract No. WEPEB117LB).

2007-08-10
IB070808-11


©2007. I-BASE HIV Treatment Bulletin. Permission to reproduce courtesy of HIV i-Base, Third Floor East, Thrale House, 44-46 Southwark Street, London SE1 1UN - T: +44 (0) 20 7407 8488 F: +44 (0) 20 7407 8489

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2007. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2007. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content.