Gay Men's Health CrisisImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in November 2001. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Gay Men's Health Crisis main menu
DonateNow
Print this article
The Field Heats Up

Treatment Issues: Newsletter of Experimental AIDS Therapies - Volume 15, Number 11/12, November/December 2001


Two recent meetings examined the need for cheaper and more accessible diagnostic assays for managing HIV therapy in less-developed regions of the world.

In October, at its meeting in San Francisco, the Infectious Diseases Society of America sponsored a Conference to Develop an HIV/AIDS Therapeutic Research Agenda for Resource-poor Countries.

In November, a workshop sponsored by GMHC and Project Inform, Monitoring and Diagnostic Tools for the Management of Antiretroviral Therapy in Resource-poor Settings, met in Bethesda, Maryland.

Here's one viewpoint from the IDSA meeting:

Wendy Stevens (University Witwatersrand, Johannesburg):

Currently there is diagnostic anarchy. There are no standards for pricing and no standard algorithms for how and when to test. We need to evaluate the cost of testing versus the cost of not knowing.

In South Africa, there is a critical need to make an early diagnosis of infection in babies — especially orphans, since they are far less likely to be adopted if they stay in the system until they are eighteen months old. For this we need an assay that is 98 percent effective by six weeks after birth — something that is as good as multiple PCR, the current gold standard, but much more accessible. So far P24 has not been successful.

Manual assays like Dynabeads for CD4 counts are impractical in high prevalence areas because the throughput is too low. It is also difficult to centralize testing in areas with poor roads. We need trial designs comparing low cost assays to the gold standards. The commercial products do not serve us. We need to stop depending on big companies and be creative about the problem; start a biotech initiative if we must.

We also need to better understand when to test. What are the best time points for testing — before or after breastfeeding? For example, why order a CD4 count while a patient has active TB? It will be misleading. Should CD4 counts only be measured when patients are well or upon admission to the hospital when they are likely to be sick? Treatment decisions are made based upon these results. We need to understand their relevance.

We need to establish a range of CD4 normal values from around the world and understand what affects these values. Complete blood counts (CBC) are different in different countries and depend on nutritional status, TB and malaria prevalence. We need natural history studies to correlate CD4 counts with symptoms.

We need to find out if virologic failure is really a disaster or if changing early is better than waiting. People who are essentially well tend not to have treatment failure or side effects. Do the surrogates we are measuring really track the disease? Like diabetes, treating HIV produces immediate changes in lab values but clinical effects may not be seen for years. In HIV, death is the outcome we care about — and it happens even faster for kids.

A trial of clinical monitoring versus CD4 monitoring for managing ART (The DART Study) is expected to begin soon in Uganda and Zimbabwe.

20011110
GM151102


Copyright © 2001 - Treatment Issues. Reproduced with permission. Treatment Issues is published twelve times yearly by GMHC, Inc. All rights reserved. Noncommercial reproduction is encouraged. Subscription lists are kept confidential. GMHC Treatment Issues, The Tisch Building, 119 West 24th Street, New York, NY 10011  fredg@gmhc.org  http://www.gmhc.org

AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, iMetrikus, Inc., the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2001. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2001. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content.