GMHC Treatment Issues; Vol 13, No. 1 January 1999
The AIDS Clinical Trials Group, an offshoot of the National Institutes of Health, is conducting a series of second-line treatment studies in volunteers with significant viral loads despite nucleoside analog and, sometimes, protease inhibitor therapy. These are the largest such trials so far. The variety of second-line regimens tested in each trial is rather complicated. Regimens and the results now available, most of which were just presented at the 6th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, are described in the table below.
Trial
ACTG 359
Participants
>6 months prior indinavir and viral load between 2,000 and 200,000.Salvage Regimens
Outcome So Far
DLV increased total drug levels of SQV/RTV or SQV/NFV. ADV unexpectedly decreased DLV levels, causing a decrease in SQV
Comments
SQV, RTV, DLV, NFV all affect and are eliminated by cytochrome P450 liver metabolism. ADV is excreted by the kidney. Virologic and immunologic response data available this spring.
Source: 6th Retrovirus Conference, abstract 365
Trial
ACTG 364
Participants
Long-time NA experience (participants rolled over from ACTG 175 to ACTG 302/303 to ACTG 364).Salvage Regimens
2 nucleoside analogs, at least one new (d4T/3TC, d4T/ddI, ddI/3TC) + EFV, NFV, or EFV + NFV
Outcome So Far
Comments
Difference between nelfinavir arm and the efavirenz-containing arms was statistically significant but unexplained. Adherence issues?
Source: 6th Retrovirus Conference, abstract 489
Trial
ACTG 368Participants
>2 months 3TC + either AZT or d4T and CD4 <250 (mostly rolled over from ACTG 320).
Mean entry VL = 16,000
Mean entry CD4 = 153
N = 283
Salvage Regimens
A: IDV q8h/EFV ± ABC
B: IDV q12h/EFV ± ABC
Outcome So Far
ABC vs. placebo, % with VL <500, week 16: 78% vs. 73%
IDV q8h vs. q12h, % viral load <500, week 48: 85% vs. 68%
Comments
ABC vs. placebo: difference was nonsignificant.
IDV q8h vs. q12h: q8h significantly better.
Source: 6th Retrovirus Conference, abstract LB15
Trial
ACTG 370Participants
Prior time on two NAs: 24 to 36 months
N = 105
Salvage Regimens
ddI/3TC or d4T/3TC switched to AZT/3TC/IDV or AZT/DLV/IDV
AZT/3TC switched to d4T/DLV/IDV
Outcome So Far
% with VL <200, week 16:
AZT/3TC/IDV - 65%
AZT/DLV/IDV - 80%
d4T/DLV/IDV - 80%
Comments
No significant difference between arms, though trend to improved outcome by switching 3TC to DLV.
Source: 6th Retrovirus Conference, abstract 488
Trial
ACTG 372B
Participants
AZT/3TC/IDV failure (ACTG 320 roll over).
Median entry VL = 39,000
Median entry CD4 = 196
N = 94
Salvage Regimens
I: ABC/EFV/ADV/NFV
II: ABC/EFV/ADV
III: NAs/EFV/ADV/NFV
IV: NAs/EFV/ADV
Outcome So Far
ABC vs. NAs, % with VL <500, week 16:
33% vs. 30%
NFV vs. placebo, % with VL <500, week 16:
43% vs. 21%
Comments
ABC vs. NAs: difference was nonsignificant.
NFV was significantly better than placebo.
Source: 6th Retrovirus Conference, abstract 490
Trial
ACTG 398Participants
VL >1,000 after >16 weeks of SQV, IDV, NFV or RTV
N = 460
Salvage Regimens
APV/ABC/EFV/ADV + SQV, IDV, NFV or placebo
Outcome So Far
No data yet
Comments
Recruiting
18 month follow-up
Trial
ACTG 400Participants
VL >1,000 after >16 weeks NFV
No prior NVP, DLV, EFV N = 300
Salvage Regimens
A: RTV/SQV/EFV/2 NAs
B: IDV/EFV/2 NAs
C: APV/EFV/2 NAs
D: IDV/APV/EFV/2 NAs
2 NAs = ddI or 3TC + AZT or d4T
Outcome So Far
No data yet
Comments
Recruiting
18 month follow-up
Abbreviations: ABC - abacavir; ADV - adefovir; APV - amprenavir; DLV - delavirdine; EFV - efavirenz; IDV - indinavir; NA - nucleoside analog; NFV - nelfinavir; NVP - nevirapine; RTV - ritonavir; SQV - saquinavir
N - number of trial participants; PK - phramacokinetics; q8h - every eight hours; q12h - every 12 hours; VL - viral load
19990115
GM130101
Copyright © 1999 - Treatment Issues. Reproduced with permission. Treatment Issues is published twelve times yearly by GMHC, Inc. All rights reserved. Noncommercial reproduction is encouraged. Subscription lists are kept confidential. GMHC Treatment Issues, The Tisch Building, 119 West 24th Street, New York, NY 10011 fredg@gmhc.org http://www.gmhc.org
ÆGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Roxane Laboratories, Inc., iMetrikus, Inc., the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1999. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
ÆGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1990, 2000. ÆGiS & the Sisters of Saint Elizabeth of Hungary. All materials appearing on ÆGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of ÆGIS and the Sisters of Saint. Elizabeth of Hungary, or the party credited as the provider of the content.