AEGiS-CATIE: Is syphilis becoming easier to treat? Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange
Click here to return to CATIE main menu
DonateNow

Is syphilis becoming easier to treat?

TreatmentUpdate82 - Vol. 9, No. 8 - pp. 4; October 1997
Sean Hosein


Summary

In the late 1980s reports appeared of cases of syphilis in HIV-infected people that did not respond to standard treatment. Indeed, in some cases, the microbe that causes syphilis, T. pallidum, had been found in the fluid surrounding the brain even after treatment with penicillin. Some doctors think that T. pallidum has become resistant to standard anti-syphilis therapy. Others think that like many illnesses seen in AIDS, HIV infection has made syphilis more difficult to treat. To investigate the effectiveness of standard anti-syphilis therapy, researchers conducted a study comparing its effect against "enhanced therapy". They found that standard therapy "appears adequate for most patients [with early syphilis], " although treatment didn't work in 20% of people.

Study details

Doctors recruited 541 subjects with syphilis, 101 of whom also had HIV infection. About 25% of the HIV+ subjects had primary syphilis, 50% had secondary syphilis and the rest early latent syphilis. Most HIV-infected subjects were male and 50% were at least 30 years old. Doctors randomly assigned people to receive either :

* standard therapy as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (USA): 2.4 million units of intramuscular penicillin G benzathine or,

* standard therapy and enhanced therapy: 2g amoxicillin/day and probenecid 500 mg three times daily, both for 10 days.

Results

Follow up -- two weeks after treatment, 84% of subjects returned for monitoring. Six months later that figure had fallen to 61% and one year later it was 52%.

Sores

About 1/3 of subjects had sores at the start of the study. Sores in HIV-infected subjects took slightly longer to heal (16.5 days) than in non-HIV-infected subjects (13 days).

Treatment failure

In about 25% of cases, blood tests revealed that syphilis had cleared within 3 months of treatment. Subjects with primary and secondary syphilis who also had HIV were more likely to have their treatment fail than non-HIV-infected subjects. Treatment failure was not linked to the type of regimen subjects received.

HIV-infected subjects with early latent syphilis were less likely to have their therapy fail than non-HIV-infected subjects with the same type of syphilis. This is quite interesting given that people with HIV are supposed to have weakened immune systems.

The type of treatment received did not appear to affect recovery from syphilis. Generally, HIV-infected subjects recovered as well as non-HIV-infected subjects. That therapy didn't work in 20% of people is troubling and does raise questions about the effectiveness of the current treatment regimens. Perhaps other antibiotics -- such as ceftriaxone -- need to be studied to see if their use is associated with lower failure rates.

REFERENCES:

1. Rolfs RT, Joesoef MR, Hendershot EF, et al. A ramdomized trial of enhanced therapy for early syphilis in patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. New England Journal of Medicine 1997;337:307-314.

971001
CATE8204


ÆGIS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Elton John AIDS Foundation, iMetrikus, Inc., the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users l This article first appeard in 1997. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

Copyright © 1997 - TreatmentUpdate. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Editor, The Canadian AIDS Treatment Information Exchange, 555 Richmond St. West, Suite 505, Box 1104, Toronto, ON, M5V 3B1 • Phone: 416-203-7122 • Toll Free: 1-800-263-1638 • Fax: 416-203-8284  http://www.catie.ca


Disclaimer: The editors have taken all such care as they consider reasonable in preparing this database, but they cannot be held responsible for any inaccuracies or mis-statements of fact contained herein. Inclusion in this database of any information on any treatment, therapy, or clinical trial in no way represents an endorsement of that treatment, therapy, or trial by ÆGiS or any of its sponsors. This data should always be used in conjunction with professional medical advice.
©1997. ÆGiS.