Being Alive; February 1994
Mark Katz MD and reported by Jim Stoecker
One big issue is that of bioavailability. You need a product that delivers enough drug to be effective. The protease inhibitor developed by Abbott required continuous intravenous infusion to deliver enough drug. This was obviously not practical, and this product development has been stopped. Roche developed an oral form that has been tested in Europe and soon begins Phase III testing at 40 sites in this country.
Meanwhile, Merck developed a protease inhibitor that has a longer half life than the Roche product. This means that it may only need to be taken twice daily, as opposed to three or four times daily for some of the other oral formulations. So, the bioavailability issue is being actively worked on.
In addition to the bioavailability issue, there is the question of how many steps it takes to synthesize the drug. The number of steps determines how costly the drug is to manufacture and thus how expensive it will be for the consumer to purchase.
Dupont-Merck has a protease inhibitor that takes only 12 steps to synthesize. Early studies, however, show that the drug may be poorly absorbed. In contrast, the better absorbed Merck product mentioned above takes 33 steps to synthesize and thus is far more costly to produce.
So, the race is on to develop a protease inhibitor that works, that is easy to administer, and that is relatively simple to make. With so many manufacturers involved in this effort, the hope is that we will have a winner in the not too distant future.
940201
BA940203
Copyright © 1994 - Beings Alive. Permission granted for noncommercial reproduction, provided that our address and phone number are included if more than short quotations are used. Subscription lists are kept confidential. Being Alive, 621 N. San Vicente Blvd., West Hollywood, CA 90069, Tel - 310.289.2551; FAX - 310.289.9866; Email: BeiAlive@aol.com http://www.beingalivela.org/