Vaccine Advance: Monkeys Still Infected, But Protected from Illness

DonateNow
Print this article

Vaccine Advance: Monkeys Still Infected, But Protected from Illness

AIDS TREATMENT NEWS Issue #353, October 20, 2000
John S. James


On October 20 researchers reported that a modern high-tech vaccine protected all monkeys vaccinated from becoming ill from an HIV-like virus, while half of the control monkeys given a sham vaccine instead had died of the infection by day 140.(1) This careful, well-designed experiment was important in showing that vaccination can protect against HIV, and in illustrating which immune mechanisms seem to be protective. But this vaccine technology is far from ready for human use--for example, the virus it protected against was exactly the same virus used to make the vaccine, while humans would have to be protected from a variety of HIV strains.

This vaccine used DNA which coded for certain proteins from the virus; in the body, the DNA produces those proteins, so that the immune system can be prepared to respond if it encounters the real virus later. In this experiment, the vaccination was given as four doses (at weeks zero, four, eight, and 40); at weeks zero and four, some of the monkeys were also given IL-2, either by a similar DNA vaccine coded to produce IL-2, or simply by injection.

At week 46 the monkeys were given a large dose of virus intravenously. All of the animals, vaccinated or not, became infected. But all of the animals that were vaccinated and received the IL-2 did not show disease progression, either clinically or by laboratory measures such as T-cell count. Their virus was well controlled, either below the limit of detection of the test or close to the limit for those that received the IL-2 by DNA technology, or under a thousand copies in those that received the IL-2 by injection (which also worked, but not as well). But the control animals who did not receive any protection had peak viral loads of 10 million or higher, and setpoint viral loads of about a million copies. (The animals that received the DNA vaccine but without any IL-2 had mixed results. And even though the IL-2 was given only at weeks zero and four, it had clear immune benefits over 10 months later, when the animals were last measured.)

The vaccinated animals had good CTL (cytotoxic T lymphocyte) response after infection, stable CD4+ counts (T-cell counts), and CD4+ T cells that responded specifically to the infecting virus. The unprotected animals had weak CTL response, rapidly falling T-cell counts, and no virus-specific CD4+ T cell responses. The vaccinated animals had no neutralizing antibodies before infection--suggesting that the cellular immune responses, not the antibodies, were important for initial protection; but neutralizing antibodies did develop by day 21 after infection, so they might also have helped control the virus. (The unvaccinated animals could not generate neutralizing antibodies because they had lost their T-cell responses to the virus.)

The researchers who did this study were mostly at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at Harvard Medical School, and at Merck Research Laboratories.

Comment

This test shows for the first time that an HIV vaccine can work to prevent illness. While this vaccine did not prevent HIV infection, it made the infection much less severe. Besides the benefit to the individual, such a vaccine could have important public-health benefits in controlling the epidemic, as persons with an undetectable or very low viral load are likely to be much less infectious than those with viral loads thousands of times higher.

It is not known if such a vaccination strategy could help those already infected--but animal tests might give a preliminary answer quickly. In any case the data from this study will indirectly help persons with HIV, by providing confirmation and additional information about what immune responses are protective. Any therapy (vaccine or otherwise) that restores those responses in HIV-positive patients who have lost them should get more attention.

This report should also alert those interested that we are in the middle of a revolution of vaccine technology--with enormous potential for improving health, especially in developing countries, if it is applied. For example, the traditional smallpox vaccine was basically dried pus from scabs on a calf--and adjuvants (chemicals which somehow made vaccines work better) were discovered by trial and error or not at all. The technology now being developed will permit the creation of rationally designed vaccines made to order for specific needs.

References

1. Barouch DH, Santra S, Schmitz JE, and others. Control of viremia and prevention of clinical AIDS in rhesus monkeys by cytokine-augmented DNA vaccination. SCIENCE. October 20, 2000; volume 290, number 5491, pages 486-492.


001020
ATN35301


Copyright © 2000 - AIDS Treatment News. Permission granted for noncommercial reproduction, provided that our address and phone number are included if more than short quotations are used. Subscription lists are kept confidential. AIDS Treatment News, Subscription and Editorial Office: 1233 Locust St., 5th floor Philadelphia, PA 19107 800/TREAT-1-2 toll-free email: aidsnews@critpath.org  http://www.aidsnews.org

Subscription Information: Call 800/TREAT-1-2: Businesses, Institutions, Professionals: $270/year. Includes early delivery of an extra copy by email. Nonprofit organizations: $135/year. Includes early delivery of an extra copy by email. Individuals: $120/year, or $70 for six months. Special discount for persons with financial difficulties: $54/year, or $30 for six months. If you cannot afford a subscription, please write or call. Outside North, Central, or South America, add air mail postage: $20/year, $10 for six months. Back issues available. Fax subscriptions, bulk rates, and multiple subscriptions are available; contact our office for details. Please send U.S. funds: personal check or bank draft, international postal money order, or travelers checks. VISA, Mastercard, and purchase orders also accepted. ISSN # 1052-4207

AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2000. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2000. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .