AIDS WEEKLY Plus - September 2002Important note: Information in this article was accurate in September 2002. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to AIDS WEEKLY PLUS main menu

HIV/AIDS Diagnosis: Controversial rapid screen effective after occupational exposure

AIDSWEEKLY Plus; September 23, 2002
Michael Greer, Senior Medical Writer


NewsRx -- A controversial rapid HIV test can be effectively used to screen for infection after occupational exposure, researchers in Virginia argue.

"The Single Use Diagnostic System (SUDS) HIV-1 Test is used to screen rapidly for antibodies to HIV type I in plasma or serum, with a reported sensitivity of more than 99.9%," explained Cassandra D. Salgado and colleagues working with the University of Virginia Health System. "We used this test from January 1999 until September 2000, when it was withdrawn from the market following reports claiming a high rate of false-positive results," they said.

Despite those negative reports, Salgado and coauthors found the SUDS test to be both sensitive and specific for finding HIV infection.

The researchers reviewed data from SUDS testing during the 21-month period of use. Results from 884 SUDS tests were examined, according to the report.

Only 1 false positive result was returned from these 884 SUDS screens, with new samples from that patient testing negative, study data showed. These results would indicate a specificity of roughly 99.9% for the SUDS assay.

Data from SUDS tests performed after its suspension produced similar results (Low rate of false-positive results with use of a rapid HIV test. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002 Jun;23(6):335-7.

"Use of the SUDS test facilitated rapid and accurate evaluation of source specimens, obviating unnecessary prophylaxis," Salgado and colleagues concluded.

The corresponding author for this report is Dr. Barry M. Farr, Box 800473 Cobb Hall, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

Key points reported in this study include:

This article was prepared by AIDS Weekly editors from staff and other reports.

020923
AW020910


Copyright © 2002 - Charles Henderson, Publisher. All rights Reserved. Permission to reproduce granted to AEGIS by Charles W. Henderson. Authorization to reproduce for personal use granted granted by C. W. Henderson, Publisher, provided that the fee of US$4.50 per copy, per page is paid directly to the Copyright Clearance Center, 27 Congress Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, USA. Published by Charles Henderson, Publisher. Editorial & Publishing Office: P.O. Box 5528, Atlanta, GA 30307-0528 / Telephone: (800) 633-4931; Subscription Office: P.O. Box 830409, Birmingham, AL 35283-0409 / FAX: (205) 995-1588 http://www.newsrx.net

AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, iMetrikus, Inc., the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2002. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright © 1980,2002. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content.