AIDS WEEKLY Plus - April - 2000Important note: Information in this article was accurate in April 2000. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to AIDS WEEKLY PLUS main menu

Screening: Study Says Mandatory Testing of Pregnant Women Would Reduce Babies with HIV and Save Money

AIDSWEEKLY Plus; Monday, April 17, 2000
Prepared by AIDS Weekly editors from staff and other reports


NewsRx - Mandatory HIV screening of pregnant women would not only reduce the number of newborns with the virus, it would also cost less than voluntary testing or no tests at all, a University of Illinois analysis shows.

While the study looked at the potential benefits in Chicago, Illinois, the researchers said similar benefits could be expected elsewhere. The study appears in the April 2000 issue of Pediatrics, the medical journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2000 Apr;105(4):E54

The authors, led by Dr. Lilly Cheng Immergluck of the University of Illinois-Chicago's pediatrics department, said mandatory testing would save money in the long run because it would reduce the amount of money spent on treatment.

Mothers who test positive for the AIDS virus could be given the anti-HIV drug zidovudine (AZT) and to take other precautions during delivery. The authors presumed that screening would take place fairly early in pregnancy, at 14 weeks.

Compared with voluntary screening, universal HIV testing of 100,000 pregnant women in Chicago would prevent 4.8 infant infections and save nearly $270,000, the researchers said. Compared with no testing, it would save $3.69 million and avert 64.6 infant infections, the authors said.

The figures are based on estimates that about two-fifths of 1% of pregnant women in Chicago have HIV.

The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have recommended universal HIV testing of pregnant women.

The researchers estimate that HIV-infected babies live on average for slightly more than nine years but because of new treatments may soon live into their early 20s.

This article was prepared by AIDS Weekly editors from staff and other reports.

000417
AW000409


Copyright © 2000 - Charles Henderson, Publisher. All rights Reserved. Permission to reproduce granted to AEGIS by Charles W. Henderson. Authorization to reproduce for personal use granted granted by C. W. Henderson, Publisher, provided that the fee of US$4.50 per copy, per page is paid directly to the Copyright Clearance Center, 27 Congress Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, USA. Published by Charles Henderson, Publisher. Editorial & Publishing Office: P.O. Box 5528, Atlanta, GA 30307-0528 / Telephone: (800) 633-4931; Subscription Office: P.O. Box 830409, Birmingham, AL 35283-0409 / FAX: (205) 995-1588 http://www.newsrx.net

AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, iMetrikus, Inc., John M. Lloyd Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2000. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1990, 2000. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content.