AEGiS-WSJ: Aetna Withdraws Antitrust Suit Against Abbott Over Drug Price Wall Street JournalImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 2004. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Wall Street Journal main menu




DonateNow



Aetna Withdraws Antitrust Suit Against Abbott Over Drug Price

Wall Street Journal - May 28, 2004
Leila Abboud, leila.abboud@wsj.com


Aetna Inc. abruptly withdrew a federal antitrust lawsuit it filed on Tuesday against Abbott Laboratories over the pharmaceutical company's fivefold price increase on an HIV drug.

Aetna declined to say why it withdrew the suit, saying it "intends to discuss with Abbott the basis for its repricing action."

The health insurer's lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for Northern California, alleged that Abbott's price increase was anticompetitive and used the drug's unusual market power to boost sales of another one of its medications. In December, the price of the drug, Norvir, was boosted to $8.57 a day from $1.75.

Norvir plays a unique role in AIDS treatment because it is usually used at low doses in combination with other protease inhibitors to boost their efficacy. Critics say the price increase was a bid to induce people to turn to Kaletra, Abbott's own combination product.

Abbott denies that and says the price increase was done to capture the true value of Norvir in AIDS treatment. Abbott said Kaletra's market share among protease inhibitors has declined slightly to 30.1% since the price increase.

The price increase has caused a huge stir in Washington. Earlier this week, federal regulators weighed whether the government should allow an early generic copy of Norvir because the drug was developed in part with taxpayer money. The government has never taken such an action before.

Officials from the National Institutes of Health say they have no timetable for deciding whether the government would act to allow an early generic of Norvir. Even if the government acted, a copy of Norvir would be slow to reach the market because Abbott could appeal the decision, and a generic maker would have to apply to the Food and Drug Administration for marketing approval.

Several members of Congress called on the Federal Trade Commission to investigate the price increase.


040528
WJ040511


Copyright © 2004 - The Wall Street Journal. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the WSJ Permissions Desk.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from the Elton John AIDS Foundation, National Library of Medicine, AIDS Walk of Orange County, and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2004. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2004. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .