
Wall Street Journal - March 22, 2002
Jill Carroll, Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal
The report, by the Washington-based Center for Studying Health System Change, said that about 15% of Americans either didn't seek or delayed receiving medical care they needed for various reasons from 1997 to 2001 -- and the biggest reason was cost. The percentage of people who didn't receive needed health care even rose slightly during the peak of the economic boom: 5.8% didn't get needed care in 2001, up from 5.2% in 1997.
The percentage of people who delayed treatment in that time stayed about the same.
"This failure to improve people's access to health care during such good economic times is a bad omen," said Paul Ginsburg, president of the center.
Children were the exception to the overall trend. About 5.1% of children didn't get the medical care they needed or delayed it in 2001, while 6.3% did so in 1997. The improvement is attributed mainly to a state health-insurance program for children that was passed by Congress in 1997.
While the report, funded by the nonpartisan, philanthropic Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, shied away from advocating a solution to these problems, it did note steps being considered by policy makers that might help, such as providing tax credits to encourage expansion of health-care coverage and building more federally funded community health centers.
Not surprisingly, the report found that many of the people who didn't seek the care they needed were poor or uninsured. Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, a patient advocacy group, noted that the report stopped in mid-2001, before many jobs were cut in the recent downturn, worsening the "epidemic" of uninsured people.
The report was a compilation of data from three surveys of a total of about 60,000 people from 1997 to 2001 performed by the center.
It comes on the heels of another health-care study by the Institute of Medicine that found minorities received inferior health care, compared with whites, even when they both were the same age and had the same insurance coverage, income or severity of disease.
That study found minorities were less likely to get the appropriate heart medications, cancer diagnosis and advanced treatments for HIV, among other disparities. The IOM study attributed the disparities in part to prejudice and stereotyping in the medical system and a lack of doctors in minority communities. Also part of the reason was that minorities tended to have less expensive insurance that didn't cover as many services, compared with whites, the study said.
Write to Jill Carroll at jill.carroll@wsj.com
020322
WJ020307
Copyright © 2002 - The Wall Street Journal. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the WSJ Permissions Desk.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Elton John AIDS Foundation UK, the National Library of Medicine, AIDS Walk of Orange County, and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2002. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2002. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .