AEGiS-WashBlade: 'They just wish we would die': Some HIV patients say Bush's '09 budget inadequate to fight disease Washington BladeImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 2008. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Washington Blade main menu
DonateNow
Print this Article





'They just wish we would die': Some HIV patients say Bush's '09 budget inadequate to fight disease

Washington Blade - February 15, 2008
Joshua Lynsen


David Phillips is despondent when he considers how Bush administration officials view HIV patients.

"I'm sure in the back of their minds, they just wish we would die and go away," said Phillips, a gay Virginia man who's HIV positive.

That's the only way to explain Bush's proposed 2009 budget, Phillips said.

"We know the services have never been there to begin to adequately meet the needs of people," he said. "And this tiny, tiny increase isn't going to help people at all."

Unveiled last week, Bush's budget adds $1 million to the $2.1 billion Ryan White CARE Act. It adds $14 million for grants such as the AIDS Drug Assistance Program, but cuts $13 million from other programs and services.

The slim net gain - effectively a 0.004 percent boost - trails the increases Bush proposed in his 2007 and 2008 budgets. About $76 million was added in 2007 and another $21 million was proposed for 2008.

Cuts resulting from Bush's budget could trigger service losses similar to those reported this week by the Maryland AIDS Administration.

The state is facing a 40 percent reduction in federal support for 2008. That $800,000 loss was expected to hurt the state's HIV surveillance activities.

AIDS groups, gay activists and medical professionals called Bush's newest proposal shameful.

"After accounting for inflation, the budget proposal amounts to a cut in funding for HIV/AIDS research, prevention, care and treatment," said Christine Lubinski, executive director at the HIV Medicine Association.

Rebecca Haag, executive director at AIDS Action, said the budget shows Bush is prepared to leave office having failed to adequately help the nation's HIV patients.

"President Bush should know by now that HIV continues to increase in this country because we have not set aside the proper amount of funds with the proper national AIDS strategy to address our diverse epidemic," she said. "If he wanted to address the unfinished business of those living with HIV in the United States, he would have submitted a very different budget."

Also frustrated were HIV patients who said they felt ignored by Bush.

Phillips and Rick Stafford, who leads the Democratic National Committee LGBT Caucus and tested HIV positive in 1984, said Bush seems more interested in spending money on foreign wars than ailing Americans.

"We're dealing with people's lives," Stafford said. "We should be willing to make the investments to protect our citizens just as we're willing to make the investment to make sure our troops are safe."

Bush's proposed budget is slated for congressional review, but members of Congress might not immediately seek to add funds.

Stafford said because Bush has pledged to veto any spending bills that exceed his request, congressional leaders might delay action in the hopes that a Democrat wins November's presidential election.

He said such a development would enable Democrats to add more funding to the Ryan White CARE Act.

"I think that's the best we can hope for right now," Stafford said, "especially with his veto option."

However it's done, though, Dr. Gene Copello of the AIDS Institute said Congress must dedicate more money to fight the epidemic and treat patients than Bush allocated.

"Most of the people who rely on these government programs for their health care and medicines are very poor and from minority communities," he said. "As the richest nation in the world, we can't turn our backs on them."


080215
WB080205


Copyright © 2008 - The Washington Blade. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of The Washington Blade content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of the Blade. The Washington Blade shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.  The Washington Blade.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Elton John AIDS Foundation UK, the National Library of Medicine, AIDS Walk of Orange County, and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2008. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2008. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .