AEGiS-WashBlade: NIH director defends controversial sex studies Social conservatives questioned value of research Washington BladeImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 2004. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Washington Blade main menu
DonateNow
Print this Article





NIH director defends controversial sex studies Social conservatives questioned value of research

Washington Blade - January 30, 2004
Joe Crea


The director of the National Institutes of Health this month defended dozens of government-supported sex research projects dealing with sexual behavior and AIDS that came under fire from some conservative lawmakers and leaders in Washington, D.C.

NIH Director Elias A. Zerhouni, who took the reins of the agency in May 2002, told his advisory committee that an internal review of about 190 NIH-funded grants concluded that all of them were scientifically valid and were of "legitimate public health value."

"When we looked at the public-health relevance, there was no question that these projects should have been funded and should continue to be funded," Zerhouni said, according to a Chronicle of Higher Education report.

Last fall, the agency was targeted by Rep. Mark Souder (R-Ind.) and the Traditional Values Coalition, a socially conservative group opposed to gay rights, who questioned why so many of the NIH grants were focusing on sexual behavior.

Rep. Souder's office did not return Blade calls.

Rep. Billy Tauzin (R-La.), who chairs the Energy & Commerce committee, said he received a "hit list" last fall from the Traditional Values Coalition. The list detailed many scientific studies that the group deemed "controversial."

On its Web site, the Traditional Values Coalition criticized the studies that include "a variety of sex studies of homosexuals, including one that studied the habits of 'lot lizards,' female prostitutes who hang out at truck stops" and notes that "other studies were on jealousy among homosexuals, and spirit mediums."

In a statement, Traditional Values Coalition Executive Director Andrea Lafferty said that her group is not opposed to research but noted that "research dollars are scarce" and "choices have to be made."

"Are we going to research finding a cure for juvenile diabetes or the sex lives of Mexican workers before and after they come over the border," she asked.

According to Rep. Henry A. Waxman's 'D-CA' office, 35 scientific organizations have issued statements in defense of peer-reviewed research funded by NIH - on HIV/AIDS, human sexuality, and risk-taking behavior.

Morals and public money

Karen L. Lightfoot, communications director and senior policy adviser for the Committee on Government Reform, of which Waxman is the ranking minority member, said that the congressman feels the research was being challenged "on ideological grounds."

Kenneth Mayer, professor of medicine and community health at Brown University in Providence, R.I., agreed and expressed concern about the criticism.

"These people have concerns about any grant that is going to increase any awareness of homosexuality and other 'unacceptable behaviors,'" Mayer said. "The points of the studies are not to promote a point of view but to promote the health of the American public. The way these grants get funded is not some capricious process. They are very difficult to get funded."

Dr. Alan Leshner, CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said that people must look at science as a combination of projects, rather than "projects by projects."

"The theologists are at it again," Leshner said. "You can take almost any individual grant and question its merit on physics. These diseases are here and they are public health problems of world proportions. As the richest nation in the world, we have an obligation to use our scientific resources to alleviate that suffering, period. So imposing moralizing on things of this level of national and international import is unacceptable."


040130
WB040115


Copyright © 2004 - The Washington Blade. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of The Washington Blade content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of the Blade. The Washington Blade shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.  The Washington Blade.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Elton John AIDS Foundation UK, the National Library of Medicine, AIDS Walk of Orange County, and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2004. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2004. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .