AEGiS-ST: Constitutional Court rules for Nevirapine Sunday Times (Johannesburg)Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 2002. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Sunday Times (Johannesburg) main menu
DonateNow
Print this article

Constitutional Court rules for Nevirapine

Sunday Times (Johannesburg) - Friday 5 Jul 2002


The Constitutional Court on Friday denied the government leave to appeal against a High Court ruling forcing it to provide anti-Aids drugs in State hospitals.

Chief Justice Arthur Chaskalson delivered the judgment saying there was a pressing need to ensure that the loss of lives was prevented.

"The anxiety of the applicants (the Treatment Action Campaign) is understandable because one is dealing here with a deadly disease," he said.

Chaskalson said the order the Constitutional Court had made would require the government to revise its policy.

A comprehensive and co-ordinated programme was necessary to help pregnant women combat HIV and counselling and testing facilities should be put in place at hospitals and clinics.

He said doctors should be permitted to prescribe nevirapine in consultation with the hospital superintendent.

The government has been ordered to pay costs in the case.

Geoff Budlender, a lawyer representing the Treatment Action Campaign, said the court's decision would save lives.

Speaking moments after South Africa's 11 top judges ruled against the government, Budlender said he had always thought their case was "fairly strong".

"This is a judgment that saves lives... it is also a victory for pregnant women with HIV and it's a victory for the constitution. It shows that our social and economic rights are real and powerful. I am very happy, I hoped for this."

Special adviser to Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, Patricia Lambert, said the judgment was "workable".

"The Minister will study the judgment during the day and will issue a more detailed statement."

Asked whether she was disappointed, Lambert replied: "I do not think that's a word that I would apply, there have been tremendous changes in government in dealing with HIV and Aids".


020705
ST020702


Copyright © 2002 - The Sunday Times. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Sunday Times Permissions Desk.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Elton John AIDS Foundation UK, the National Library of Medicine, AIDS Walk of Orange County, and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2002. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2002. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .