San Francisco Examiner - November 7, 2007
Karl B. Hille, khille@baltimoreexaminer.com
The administration did not verify that claims were "supported by valid physician prescriptions" or that they "had not also been paid by third party insurers," including the state's own Maryland Health Insurance Program (MHIP), according to the report released by the Office of Legislative Audits. "As a result, a pharmacy could request authorizations to dispense medications that were not prescribed ... or bill the Administration for claims that were also paid by third party insurers."
Out of a $54 million annual budget, the AIDS Administration spends about $1.6 million in insurance premiums through MHIP, according to the audit.
In 2006, the administration covered $1.4 million in pharmacy claims directly, in addition to $1.2 million in claims through MHIP.
In response, Health Secretary John Colmers wrote that the administration was seeking outside auditors to ensure Maryland does not pay claims that should be covered by private insurance.
Additional audits will ensure drugs are dispensed with a valid prescription and that the state does not pay twice.
The administration will automatically reject drug payment claims when they don't have documentation showing why any third-party insurance refused coverage.
The Maryland AIDS Drug Assistance Program (MADAP), through which the administration ultimately pays its claims, is "absolutely critical" to the fight against AIDS, said Baltimore City Health Commissioner Dr. Joshua Sharfstein. "Whatever system they implement, it has to be done well."
State law says MADAP is the "payer of last resort," said Baltimore's HIV Clinician Dr. Laura Herrera. "Generally once [people are] enrolled, there's no problem getting their prescriptions filled."
Any gaps in prescription coverage could be critical, Sharfstein said, because HIV quickly adapts to failures to keep up treatment.
AIDS Administration audit findings:
* No controls prevented paying for drugs for insured individuals
* No verification of whether prescriptions were valid or the state was paying twice
* Access to the claims and payment database was not adequately restricted
* Bank accounts maintained by a private contractor were not properly insured
071107
SE071103
Copyright © 2007 - San Francisco Examiner. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the San Francisco Examiner, Permissions Desk, 110 Fifth Street, P.O. Box 7260, San Franciso, CA 94120.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Roche and Trimeris, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2007. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2007. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .