Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 2003. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
San Francisco Chronicle - Tuesday, July 29, 2003
Debra J. Saunders
But what Walters doesn't see is how his actions are helping the people he opposes.
By enforcing federal marijuana laws to the detriment of sick people, Walters has pushed some skittish pols to take a principled stand which they probably would have preferred to avoid. Last week, the Hinchey-Rohrabacher bill to bar the Department of Justice from challenging medical-marijuana laws in the states that have sanctioned medical-marijuana use (there are 10 states, including California) -- lost. Still, the vote in the House was 273 to 152.
That's progress from a 311-94 split in 1998.
Walters isn't losing support because he's right.
Yes, some medical-marijuana proponents are drug devotees. Witness Ed Rosenthal -- the Bay Area activist who received a one-day sentence for growing medical marijuana, even as poor men growing the same plants elsewhere often are sentenced to long, hard time. Rosenthal was a columnist for High Times and Cannabis Culture.
Walters is losing support because, apart from Rosenthal, federal raids confiscated the pot stocks of very sick people who consider marijuana to be a benign medicine.
Members of the raided Santa Cruz Wo/Men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana have found marijuana helps them with epilepsy, post-polio syndrome and HIV. The group isn't a club for party animals; in the seven months after the September 2002 the raid, at least 12 members died.
Those who lived had less marijuana available to relieve their pain.
Federal law should be changed: It makes no sense for marijuana to be a Schedule I substance under the federal Controlled Substance Act, which keeps doctors from recommending what they believe to be the right drugs. (I realize many doctors never would prescribe marijuana, but even they must agree that professionals of good will can have a different perspective on many drugs.)
To counter the federal act, medical-marijuana proponents have concentrated on the states. The courts have been clear about the federal law's power to trump state law. Hinchey-Rohrabacher was a way to fiddle with federal law in those states which have passed their own medical marijuana laws, rather than attempt to legalize it nationwide.
States' rights provide a good compromise. Let states decide what they want to do, then states on both sides of the issue can learn from the experience of others.
The Hinchey-Rohrabacher vote was instructive. Republicans -- like author Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Huntington Beach -- are supposed to believe in states' rights. This time, however, most suddenly decided a centralized D.C.- based government knows best.
Democrats usually want Washington to tell locals how to live -- as in, Alaskans shouldn't get to choose to drill for more oil where they live. But, suddenly, many Democrats were enamored of states' rights.
OK, so neither party gets points for principled consistency. At least the House is moving in the right direction.
But if Walters and the feds choose to prosecute sick, needy people, and to go after the licenses of doctors who care for them, there could be a backlash.
In fact, there should be.
E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com.
030729
SC030721
Copyright © 2003 - San Francisco Chronicle Press. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the San Francisco Chronicle, Permissions Desk, 901 Mission Street, San Franciso, CA 94103. You may also send a fax to (415) 495-3843, or an email message to chronperm@sfgate.com. http://www.sfgate.com.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Elton John AIDS Foundation UK, the National Library of Medicine, AIDS Walk of Orange County, and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2003. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2003. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .