AEGiS-SC: DEADLY NEEDLES: New Technology Not Likely to Reach Addicts San Francisco ChronicleImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 1998. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to San Francisco Chronicle main menu
DonateNow


DEADLY NEEDLES: New Technology Not Likely to Reach Addicts

San Francisco Chronicle - Tuesday, October 27, 1998
Reynolds Holding, Chronicle Legal Affairs Writer


They arrived an average of one a week in late 1933, 17 bodies carted into the New York City medical examiner's office, all former heroin addicts, all dead of malaria.

It would take Dr. Milton Helpern, assistant medical examiner, until March 1934, but with help from two narcotics detectives he made the connection: The dead addicts had shared home-made syringes contaminated with malaria.

"This method of taking the drug is comparatively new in New York," explained Helpern in a 1934 article on the outbreak, "but has been practiced for many years in other localities."

Over the next 64 years, the emergence of AIDS, hepatitis and other deadly diseases would heighten the danger of sharing syringes to inject illegal drugs. Today, directly or indirectly, contaminated needles cause 40 percent of new AIDS infections in the United States, according to Surgeon General David Satcher. The figure among women and children is 75 percent.

The statistics have intensified a search for ways to stop the sharing of syringes and needles. One response has been the development of syringes that are impossible to use more than once. But these single-use -- or autodestruct -- syringes have not caught on in the United States, in part because few are available here.

Seeing little demand in the U.S. health care industry, manufacturers market them almost exclusively for medical use in developing countries. Even if more were available, though, drug addicts might not want them.

Autodestruct syringes are more expensive, and a new one would be required for each high.

"It's like using a fork which self-destructs after you put a bit of food into your mouth," explained former drug user Bruce Stepherson at a conference on autodestruct syringes in 1991. "This is not practical unless one is receiving forks free of charge."

If autodestruct syringes were the only ones available, addicts would either defeat the single-use mechanism or make reusable syringes from eyedroppers, old needles and modified baby pacifiers, said Stepherson.

"In the same way you and I are concerned with the costs associated with the necessities of life," he said, "so too is the drug injector with the necessities of getting high."

A far more controversial response to needle sharing has been needle exchange programs, where drug addicts can get sterile syringes for free. There are about 100 such programs in more than 20 states.

A growing number of studies shows that needle exchanges often help prevent the spread of disease without encouraging illegal drug use. Seven major surveys -- including one conducted in 1993 by researchers with the University of California at San Francisco -- have found that programs reduce syringe sharing and the spread of HIV dramatically while sending thousands of participants to drug treatment.

But opponents such as Barry McCaffrey, the Clinton administration's national drug policy director, contend needle exchanges convey the wrong message: that illegal drug use is an accepted way of life.

And in July, President Clinton acknowledged the benefits of the programs while refusing to lift a 9-year-old ban on federal financing of needle exchanges -- a decision that provoked outrage from all sides, even within the White House.

"Basically, they made a political decision," said Dr. Peter Lurie, a public health advocate and professor affiliated with UCSF. "For those of us who have been laboring in the field for years, it was an enormous slap in the face."
981009
SC981009


Copyright © 1998 - San Francisco Chronicle Press. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the San Francisco Chronicle, Permissions Desk, 901 Mission Street, San Franciso, CA 94103. You may also send a fax to (415) 495-3843, or an email message to chronperm@sfgate.com.   http://www.sfgate.com.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1998. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 1998. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .