South African Press Association (Johannesburg) - August 5, 2002
"We haven't decided on an exact legal route yet but we will make sure that any reverse decision is heard. We're not going to quietly sit by if this is a serious threat," the TAC's Mark Heywood told reporters in Johannesburg.
He was reacting to newspaper reports at the weekend that the MCC was reviewing its approval of nevirapine because it had concerns about its effectiveness and toxicity.
MCC registrar Precious Matsoso told Sapa on Monday the organisation would first consider upcoming developments regarding a Ugandan study on nevirapine before deciding about its future registration.
"I don't know where this thing of banning comes from. I don't know why this big fuss about one drug," she said.
Heywood, however, said the MCC's behaviour was suspect.
Shortly before the start of two key court cases about the government's Aids policy, the MCC issued statements expressing concern about the safety of nevirapine.
"We find that unbecoming behaviour and it certainly raises questions about them.
We have cause for concern. We hope the MCC will not risk its sterling reputation of being independent of the government."
He urged the council to review the use of the drug in an objective, careful and scientific manner.
"They should insulate themselves from political pressure."
Heywood said there was no reason to question the safety of nevirapine.
Earlier this year, the Constitutional Court ordered the government to provide the drug to pregnant women in all state hospitals. This was after the government opted to appeal a similar high court order in favour of the TAC.
Nevirapine is registered in South Africa for treating HIV/Aids patients and for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of the virus.
The manufacturer, Boehringer Ingelheim, withdrew its application to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to have the drug registered for MTCT prevention a few months ago.
This came after the FDA found that the documentation of a nevirapine study done in Uganda -- the so-called HIVNET 012 -- did not meet its requirements.
The HIVNET 012 study was used as a basis for the registration of the drug in South Africa. After withdrawing its application to the FDA, Boehringer Ingelheim informed the MCC of this decision.
"That was of concern to us," Matsoso said.
However, the MCC had been informed that remonitoring was being done in Uganda.
"That will inform us if the data is still credible," she said.
020805
SA020802
Copyright © 2002 - South African Press Association. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the South African Press Association, Cotswold House, Greenacres Office Park, Cnr. Victory & Rustenburg Roads, VICTORY PARK, PO BOX 7766, JOHANNESBURG, 2000; Fax No: +27 11 782-1587/8, Tel No: +27 11 782-1600.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2002. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2002. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .