AEGiS-SAPA: Concourt to Rule On Nevirapine South African Press AssociationImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 2002. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Associated Press main menu
DonateNow


Concourt to Rule On Nevirapine

South African Press Association (Johannesburg) - July 4, 2002


JOHANNESBURG - The Constitutional Court is expected to rule on Friday on the government's application for leave to appeal a high court order forcing it to provide nevirapine in state hospitals pending the outcome of another appeal.

Chief Justice Arthur Chaskalson recalled the court while it was in recess during April to hear the government's request.

The Constitutional Court will rule whether the government should be granted leave to appeal a Pretoria High Court execution order compelling it to provide nevirapine to HIV-pregnant women in state hospitals with the capacity to do so.

Pretoria High Court Judge Chris Botha in December last year made a ruling which included an order that the Minister of Health and all provincial MECs, except the Western Cape's, extend their anti-retroviral nevirapine programmes beyond the existing 18 pilot sites.

On March 11, Botha allowed the government to apply to the Constitutional Court for leave to appeal against that order.

The judge also granted an execution order, which meant that the government should go ahead with the nevirapine roll-out pending the outcome of the Constitutional Court appeal bid.

The minister and MECs subsequently asked Botha to also allow them to apply to the Constitutional Court for leave to appeal against the execution order. Botha refused this and granted a counter-application by the Treatment Action Campaign and two co-applicants that the order should be executed.

However, the Minister and MECs lodged an application with the Constitutional Court against both the latter order and the one of March 11.

The Constitutional Court on Friday will decide whether the latter order could be appealed against, and if so, whether leave to appeal should be granted.

If such leave was granted, the court would also decide whether the order on TAC's counter-application should be set aside.
020704
SA020701


Copyright © 2002 - South African Press Association. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the South African Press Association, Cotswold House, Greenacres Office Park, Cnr. Victory & Rustenburg Roads, VICTORY PARK, PO BOX 7766, JOHANNESBURG, 2000; Fax No: +27 11 782-1587/8, Tel No: +27 11 782-1600.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2002. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2002. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .