South African Press Association (Johannesburg) - May 8, 2002
The child was stillborn three years ago.
"She was deprived of the right to do whatever she could to prevent the transfer of the virus to her baby," counsel for the woman, identified only as VRM or Ms V, told the court.
Ms V claims that an obstetrician, identified only as Dr E Labuschagne, tested her for HIV without her consent in January 1999. He failed to tell her that the results had come back positive until after her baby was stillborn on April 3.
She claims the doctor told her at her bedside that the child had also been HIV positive, and this had been the cause of death. No consent was given for the child to be tested.
Ms V subsequently lodged a complaint to the Health Professions Council of SA (HPCSA), which found there was no evidence of improper or disgraceful conduct on the doctor's part, and resolved that no further steps be taken.
She is now asking the court to overturn that decision, in order for the matter to be referred to a disciplinary committee.
The woman has asked the court to protect her identity to safeguard her employment and preserve her privacy.
Her legal counsel, Lara Grenfell, argued that the council had failed to execute its task of protecting the public and guiding the profession. Its decision displayed paternalism and capriciousness, and was grossly irregular.
Labuschagne, she said, had failed to live up to the council's guidelines on the management of HIV-positive patients, and should be punished.
Grenfell questioned Labuschagne's statement that he did not tell Ms V of her HIV-positive status because she was merely a month from delivery and he did not want to complicate matters.
He deprived from her the ability to make a decision on the use of anti-retroviral drugs, and on steps she could take to prevent her husband from getting infected as well, Grenfell argued. The husband later tested negative.
Ms V also claims the doctor failed to give her any special care notwithstanding his awareness of her condition. Among other things, he ignored the importance of performing a caesarean section before the onset of labour in a bid to further reduce the chances of the virus being transmitted to the baby.
Reacting to Labuschagne's statement that no counseling facilities were available at the Louis Trichardt state hospital, where Ms V was treated, Grenfell asked the court: "Why didn't he just do it himself? If he was not prepared to counsel her, he should never have subjected her to an HIV test."
Seth Nthai, for the council, argued that the decision to inform a patient of her HIV status remained at the discretion of the doctor.
In this case, Labuschagne took into account the possible psychological consequences of telling his patient.
"It would not have made much difference, given the statistics that of the 60 percent of babies born HIV negative only half remain so," Nthai told the court. "These are the things he took into consideration."
Nthai argued the council was not only there to protect members of the public, but also medical practitioners.
Judgment was reserved.
020508
SA020505
Copyright © 2002 - South African Press Association. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the South African Press Association, Cotswold House, Greenacres Office Park, Cnr. Victory & Rustenburg Roads, VICTORY PARK, PO BOX 7766, JOHANNESBURG, 2000; Fax No: +27 11 782-1587/8, Tel No: +27 11 782-1600.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2002. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2002. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .