AEGiS-NYT: Editorial: Preventing AIDS Prevention New York TimesImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 2007. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Associated Press main menu
DonateNow


Editorial: Preventing AIDS Prevention

The New York Times - December 28, 2007


Congress and President Bush have done the right thing, lifting a disastrous nine-year ban that prevented Washington from using locally raised tax dollars on needle-exchange programs that help fight the spread of AIDS. Unfortunately, that still leaves in force an even broader and more damaging law that prohibits the use of federal funds for needle-exchange programs in the United States or abroad.

That ban must also be rescinded.

The country's most important medical and public health organizations endorsed needle-exchange programs more than a decade ago, and such programs have proved highly successful all over the world. Opponents' charges that needle exchanges would encourage addiction have turned out to be nonsense.

Meanwhile, the AIDS epidemic continues to spread, driven in part by intravenous drug addicts who become infected when they share dirty needles. They then pass H.I.V., the virus that causes AIDS, on to wives and lovers and unborn children.

A recent report by the District of Columbia's health department found that more than 20 percent of the city's AIDS cases could be traced to intravenous drug users. The city, meanwhile, has the highest AIDS rate in the nation, with 128.4 cases per 100,000 people, compared with 14 cases per 100,000 in the country as a whole.

The number of cases is growing faster in Washington than in other cities where needle-exchange programs have had more support. Barred from using its own tax dollars, Washington was scraping by with a privately funded program that reached only a small fraction of those who need it.

First enacted by Congress 20 years ago, the prohibition against using federal dollars for these crucial needle-exchange programs has hobbled AIDS prevention efforts both in this country and abroad. Health organizations using American tax dollars should be encouraged rather than blocked from developing these programs.

Eliminating the federal ban would save many thousands of lives every year.


071228
NYT071212


Copyright © 2007 - The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved. All New York Times articles contained on the AEGiS web site are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of The New York Times Company. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content. However, you may download articles (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal, noncommercial use only.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2007. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2007. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .