New York Times - October 17, 2000
Henri E. Cauuin
For months, Mr. Mbeki has publicly questioned the role that the human immunodeficiency virus, or H.I.V., plays in causing AIDS and speculated about the place that poverty and malnutrition may have in passing on the affliction.
The controversy bubbled up in March when it emerged that Mr. Mbeki had begun assembling a scientific advisory panel that would include dissident scientists who argue that AIDS is not caused by H.I.V.
He had already entangled himself in another AIDS dispute last October , when he and his health minister disputed the safety and effectiveness of AZT, a standard drug used to block transmission of H.I.V. from mother to child. The health minister later conceded that the drug was safe enough to dispense but said the government could not afford it.
Activists and researchers here and abroad have criticized the president's comments as irresponsible and baffling, particularly since South Africa, with 4.2 million people who are H.I.V.-positive, has more infections than any other country in the world.
Bowing to the realities of a consuming public relations problem, Mr. Mbeki has decided to curb his own comments on the cause of AIDS, said the government spokesman, Joel Netshitenzhe.
"He has scaled down on his participation in the debate," said Mr. Netshitenzhe, who said the president had delegated the question to a committee of ministers so that he could attend to other matters.
In moving to minimize his profile on the issue, Mr. Mbeki is, without renouncing his ideas or opinions on the subject, effectively conceding that the criticism that has dogged him for months has damaged more than his own reputation.
Even staunch political allies of the president and his governing African National Congress party have moved to distance themselves from Mr. Mbeki's pronouncements on H.I.V. and AIDS. Last month, the Congress of South African Trade Unions and the South African Communist Party publicly stated that H.I.V. causes AIDS and called on the president to do the same.
So far Mr. Mbeki has not done so, going only so far as to say, in remarks to Parliament last month, that the government's AIDS policies are based on the "thesis" that H.I.V. causes AIDS, a distinction that compounded the frustration of some of his critics.
Yet a number of moves this month suggest that the mounting criticism finally forced the government to do something more dramatic, even it fell short of the blanket admission many people demanded.
An ad campaign begun earlier this month emphasizes the government's advocacy of AIDS awareness and prevention, a message that was being undermined, Mr. Netshitenzhe said, by the intense attention Mr. Mbeki was receiving by local and foreign news media.
"The manner in which the debate on the scientific issues was being reported tended to cloud what government's position was on the issue was," he said.
And a decision to expand research into the effectiveness of Nevirapine in combating mother-to-child transmission has encouraged some advocates who were dismayed by the government's reluctance to provide some anti-AIDS drugs that have shown promising results elsewhere.
Morna Cornell, the director of the AIDS Consortium, an umbrella organization representing more than 350 AIDS groups here, said the shift on Nevirapine was one heartening sign that the inertia to which the president had contributed was finally ending.
As much as she wished the president had gone further and agreed that H.I.V. causes AIDS, she said, she was relieved that he had at least did what he did.
"I was just profoundly glad that it happened," Ms. Cornell said. "At least he's being strategic enough to recognize the damage that has been caused and to acknowledge it and to extract himself from it. We really just hope it's going to simmer down and we can see some real action."
Whether this latest attempt at damage control succeeds will be a crucial test for the president and staff, who came into office last year buoyed by optimism only to see their plans bogged down by the rancor over AIDS and by the civil unrest in neighboring Zimbabwe.
001017
NY001001
Copyright © 2000 - The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved. All New York Times articles contained on the AEGiS web site are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of The New York Times Company. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content. However, you may download articles (one machine readable copy and one print copy per page) for your personal, noncommercial use only.
AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, the Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2000. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor. AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV. Copyright ©1980, 2000. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .