Newsday - June 29, 2003
Laurie Garrett, Staff Writer
SARS, the disease that appeared with no warning seven months ago, posed a threat far beyond infection. The health of countries, not just people, was at stake. National economies, tourism, foreign investment - all were pummeled by the appearance of the virulent, previously unknown disease labeled severe acute respiratory syndrome.
Today Asia is getting back to business. The World Health Organization last week removed Beijing from its SARS-related travel advisories, leaving only Taiwan and Toronto on the list of potential danger sites. Hong Kong plans to throw a multimillion-dollar party headlined by an all-star roster including the Rolling Stones, Ricky Martin and former President Bill Clinton, hoping to lure long-gone tourists.
But scientists and public health experts say the nations of Asia had better brace themselves; it simply isn't possible to eradicate a disease that remains a mystery. For all that has been learned in the four months since SARS' emergence was made public, many questions still don't have answers.
And even as the toll has leveled off - the number of cases worldwide stands at 8,450 and deaths at more than 800- and the masks have come off, public health officials have begun to confront the spectre that SARS may not be finished - and that it could return as early as the fall.
At last week's World Health Organization SARS meeting in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, doctors and scientists rattled off a list of concerns, among them:
Where did the virus come from? Does it have a seasonal cycle? Why was Vietnam able to stop its outbreak in about two weeks, but Toronto is at three months and counting?
Moreover, if SARS does come back, have the nations of the world learned about the importance of openly reporting its presence? Can China, which kept the early outbreak hidden, be expected to behave any differently?
"The world challenge now will be to keep the resources and interest in pursuing this disease," Dr. David Heymann, who heads epidemic responses for WHO, said in an interview.
Finding the Source
Today, though the leading theory is that the SARS virus jumped from animals to humans, the identity of the animal - or animals - has not been confirmed. And that's information researchers say is vital if a second wave is to be fought successfully.
In late May researchers from the University of Hong Kong, led by Dr. Yuen Kwoh-yung, announced they had isolated the SARS virus from the blood, urine and feces samples of an animal known as a masked palm civet. It is sold as food in an exotic live animal market in Shenzhen just across the border from Hong Kong. The virus was subsequently found in other species, including raccoon dogs and Chinese badgers. Guangdong health authorities said tests in several such markets found that 66 percent of the animal sellers and handlers tested positive for SARS antibodies.
These findings seemed to jibe with earlier discoveries that chefs who worked in restaurants that featured such exotic animal meats were among those sickened in the outbreak's early wave. Other studies began to find that the virus could grow in the suspect animals, and half of the civet farmers Yuen tested carried antibodies against the virus.
It looked like an open and shut case: SARS came from civets or badgers or raccoon dogs slaughtered by restaurant chefs and eaten by Cantonese diners. But the certainty was short-lived.
One thousand civet ranchers in Taiwan filed a $10 million lawsuit Tuesday, relying on a study by Beijing Agricultural University claiming to have found no SARS evidence in 720 animals collected in Guangdong markets. The ranchers - charging that the researchers hurt their business - said SARS had been found in many species, including reptiles, and that the announced findings represented nothing more than laboratory contamination.
SARS scientist Wolfgang Preiser of the University of Frankfurt, who carried out some of WHO's earliest investigations in China, said it's too early to pinpoint where SARS came from but believes the Hong Kong researchers are closing in on the culprit.
"The reason for such conflicting data [is] obvious: On one hand, people are breaking hot news to the media; on the other, the interests of the food industries and officials are to keep everything quiet," Preiser said. "Nevertheless, [the questions] are very urgent; for one of the potential sources for a re-emergence of SARS are clearly animals."
Preiser pointed out that about half of all SARS cases in Guangdong were never connected to human contact, and many could have come directly from animal contact. If that is the case, he says, SARS eventually will come back, via the same animals.
The array of species could represent contagion within the markets, WHO virologist Dr. Klaus Stohr said in a telephone interview from Beijing. A visit to Chau Tau Market in Guangzhou in May found animals housed in tiny wire cages stacked five or six high. Almost all animals had wounds, and they urinated, bled and defecated on one another. The market was watered down periodically with a high-powered fire hose, blasting the feces into aerosolized bits.
The molecular biology indicates the virus is probably new to all the animals in these markets, as well - except, of course, whichever species is SARS' natural host. And one intriguing finding, Stohr said, is that scientists have found animals that, despite making strong antibody responses against the virus, are passing SARS in their stools and urine. This is biologically contradictory, he insists.
"So we are all in the dark," he said.
A Seasonal Disease
If SARS is likely to re-emerge, when should Asia expect to see it again?
Despite new restrictions on the sale and trade of such animals, consumer demand - particularly among the Cantonese - remains high. Dining on ostriches, bullfrogs and cobras is more than a culinary tradition; it is key to ancient notions of health and long life. A recent poll found that half of all Chinese - not just the Cantonese - admit to eating exotic animals on occasion.
Guangdong authorities say restaurant worker Huang Xingchu, who worked in kitchens that slaughtered exotic animals, was the first SARS case, in November. But details of Huang's illness are vague, including the date his symptoms began, because he disappeared, fleeing the stigma associated with SARS.
Is it likely SARS will return in the late fall? Experts say the answer at this point is maybe.
Officials in Guangdong point out that Cantonese people consume animals in seasonal patterns - mammals primarily when there is fear of the "cold diseases" of winter, such as tuberculosis and pneumonia. So if SARS is present in civets or other mammals, human contact with the virus would commence about November as animals are butchered and consumed.
Yet another line of reasoning argues that seasonal habitat patterns may make animals more vulnerable to hunters during the fall or lead to seasonal infections in animals.
"I don't think we are in a position yet to answer any of these questions," Preiser insisted.
Most human cases remain unexplained. The basics of human-to-human transmission are known: The virus is carried in human droplets from the lung, nose or mouth into the air, where they are inhaled directly by another person. Or transmission may be indirect, when a person touches a surface on which droplets fell, then touches his or her mouth, nose or eyes. A Hong Kong study showed that none of the doctors and nurses who consistently used face masks and washed their hands while treating SARS patients contracted it.
But there are suspicions that some guests in Hong Kong's Metropole Hotel in February - when an ailing professor from China was a guest - contracted SARS by touching an elevator button. All who got sick had stayed on the ninth floor, and would have been pressing the same elevator button.
The March outbreak of more than 320 cases in Hong Kong's Amoy Gardens condominium complex presented another possible transmission route. Most residents were young people who, despite their youth, got very sick, suffering not only respiratory symptoms but also gastrointestinal illness. Researchers discovered the virus was being passed in the patients' stools and urine.
A probe determined the first Amoy Gardens case was a 33-year-old man from Shenzhen, China, who visited in March when he was ill, suffering from diarrhea. Authorities concluded the virus spread through his feces, and possibly when his contaminated hands touched banisters, doorknobs and elevator buttons.
Yet investigators still need to determine how much of a role the plumbing system played: How much fecal material was aerosolized into people's apartments through faulty plumbing systems? And how much from contamination of doorknobs and other surfaces?
Controlling the Spread
There is the possibility SARS could re-emerge without any animal involvement. Many patients have recovered and continue to pass live viruses in their stools and urine, raising the possibility of transmission through plumbing or doorknobs and banisters.
"If there is environmental transmission, then this disease can come back," Heymann warned.
Researchers have established that the SARS virus can survive on plastic or hard surfaces for hours. And the colder the environment, the longer the virus lives. Bound to human fecal material, it can survive for up to five days, scientists reporting to WHO said.
Puzzles also remain about transmission within hospitals. Topping the list: Why was impoverished, resource-scarce Vietnam able to control its outbreak in about two weeks, while sophisticated, high-tech Toronto, Hong Kong and Singapore struggled for months?
The Vietnam outbreak started in Hanoi's French Hospital Feb. 28, before Guangdong's epidemic was known to the outside world and before the virus was identified. Italian Dr. Carlo Urbani, who worked for WHO, specializing in infectious diseases, set up systems of infection control and subsequently died of SARS.
About a week after the first case surfaced, Urbani shut down French Hospital, moving SARS patients into the nearby public Bach Mai Hospital. He also insisted to Vietnamese government leaders that they notify world health authorities.
"By dealing with the outbreak openly and decisively, Vietnam risked damage to its image and economy," Brigg Reilly of M decins Sans Fronti res (Doctors Without Borders), who worked at Urbani's side, wrote last month in the New England Journal of Medicine. "If it had decided to take refuge in secrecy, however, the results might have been catastrophic."
Openness, and Urbani's decision to relocate the SARS patients, were part of Vietnam's success story. Infection control nurse Hege H. R"nnevig, also of MSF, helped relocate the 63 patients. "French Hospital was quite 'high-tech', with air conditioner, small rooms, all with carpets on the floors," R"nnevig recalled. In contrast, Bach Mai Hospital "is a hospital with big, 'airy' rooms, no air conditioner, no glass in the windows. ... And Bach Mai was a simple hospital, with not a lot of high-tech equipment."
"This is a high-tech disease," Heymann said. It spreads in settings that use sophisticated devices - respirators, patient monitors, intravenous devices.
It's possible Vietnam was simply fortunate - that all its cases stemmed from a so-called "super-spreader."
The Real Culprit
Physicians now say the virus is not what kills people: It is the immune system's vigorous attempts to slaughter the virus that prove fatal. Autopsies of the lungs of SARS victims show the collateral damage the immune system leaves in its wake.
Dr. Xu Dao Zhen, chief of infectious diseases for Beijing's Ditan Hospital, handled about 200 SARS cases in the spring and discovered that the patients who fared the worst were, paradoxically, otherwise the healthiest: young adults. "The human being hasn't found a way to combat the virus," Xu said in an interview in Ditan Hospital. White blood cell counts fall instead of rise to fight the infection.
WHO officials say only a handful of HIV-positive SARS patients have been seen - their small numbers perhaps implying that a distressed immune system is less likely to suffer the assaults of the SARS coronavirus. Yet Hong Kong doctors noted patients with hepatitis B are more likely to die of SARS if they contract it.
China's way of controlling its epidemic rested with methods of quarantine and isolation. Millions of health-care workers, police, military personnel and Communist officials were mobilized to create a metaphoric Great Wall against the virus. Nationwide, fever stations formed the crux of the effort.
Throughout Shanxi and Hubei provinces masked police and health workers, many attired in bio-protection suits, stood along the roadsides for days, screening all vehicles. A fever over 100.4 Fahrenheit meant a traveler was taken to one of the Styrofoam- and-aluminum SARS hospitals the government erected - structures that now sit idle and empty.
But public health experts fret that such massive efforts, all hinging on fever checks, are not sustainable and may fail to catch a re-emerging outbreak. The flu season has begun in China, increasing the numbers of people who have fevers and complicating diagnosis.
What is lacking is a long-term commitment to public health, argues Dr. Henk Bekedam, who led WHO operations in Beijing. That means a network of medical laboratories, tracing of an infected person's contacts and surveillance systems, all relying on open information.
"China is Ground Zero, and will also be the last battleground against SARS," Bekedam said during an interview in his Beijing office. "What I want to see in Beijing is getting back to the things we don't understand. ... An animal reservoir - do we still have one here? ... The question will remain if it's in those wild animals, can it be transferred to domestic animals?"
Such questions require joint research between Chinese and foreign scientists, he said. But such collaboration is almost unheard of.
Stohr says it will be impossible to predict the future of SARS, or block the virus' re-emergence, without Chinese scientific cooperation in pursuit of the animal that normally harbors the virus, and the human epidemiology of transmission and disease.
Huang is optimistic that the lessons of SARS have been learned by China's leaders. But not everybody agrees. Columbia University China analyst Pei Minxin said June 18 in Manhattan that China's leaders have used the epidemic to solidify their power. But dominating positions in the Communist Party's Politburo are members of the old Jiang Zemin faction of the party. While President Hu Jintao's faction believes SARS signals the need for greater investment in health, more openness and slow democratization, Jiang's followers see victory over SARS as proof of the need for a more totalitarian approach. After all, they argue, it was mass mobilization and the threat of imprisonment and execution that stopped the spread.
"It is always possible that the Chinese government has learned the wrong lessons from the SARS crisis," Pei says.
THE SARS TOLL: As the deadly SARS epidemic seems to be coming under control, a look back at cases and fatalities in the areas affected.
Total Total Most recent
Reported deaths probable
Country cases case
1. Australia 5 0 May 12
2. Brazil 3 0 June 9
3. Britain 4 0 April 29
4. Canada 251 37 June 25
5. China 5,327 348 June 25
6. Colombia 1 0 May 5
7. Finland 1 0 May 7
8. France 7 0 May 9
9. Germany 10 0 June 4
10. Hong Kong 1,755 297 June 11
11. India 3 0 May 13
12. Indonesia 2 0 April 23
13. Ireland 1 0 March 21
14. Italy 5 0 April 29
15. Kuwait 1 0 April 9
16. Macao 1 0 May 21
17. Malaysia 5 2 May 20
18. Mongolia 9 0 May 6
19. New Zealand 1 0 April 30
20. Philippines 14 2 May 15
21. Romania 1 0 March 27
22. Russia 1 0 May 31
23. Singapore 206 32 May 18
24. South Africa 1 1 April 9
25. South Korea 3 0 May 14
26. Sapin 1 0 April 2
27. Sweden 3 0 April 18
28. Switzerland 1 0 March 17
29. Taiwan 681 84 June 19
30. Thailand 9 2 June 7
31. United States 74 0 June 23
32. Vietnam 63 5
TOTALS 8,450 810
SOURCE: World Health Organization
The Current Situation: SARS began in the Far East. With 111 current probable cases, Taiwan remains the nation or territory most vulnerable to a resurgence of te epidemic.
Brazil 1
France 1
Germany 1
Russia 1
Singapore 4
Canada 24
United States 39
Hong Kong 42
China 78
Taiwan 111
Total Current Probable Cases: 302
SOURCE: World Health Organization
030629
ND030601
Copyright © 2003 - Newsday. All rights reserved. All pages of newsday.com are copyright © Newsday, Inc. Other parties may also own rights to portions of newsday.com content. No portion of newsday.com content may be published, broadcast or distributed, directly or indirectly, in any medium without Newsday's prior written consent. Newsday, Inc. will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any content on newsday.com. http://www.newsday.com.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2003. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2003. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .