AEGiS-LT: Federal Spending on HIV Prevention to Shift Course Los Angeles TimesImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 2003. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Los Angeles Times main menu
DonateNow


Federal Spending on HIV Prevention to Shift Course

Los Angeles Times - April 18, 2003
Charles Ornstein, Times Staff Writer


The new focus will be on people already infected with the virus, not those who are at risk. AIDS groups criticize change. At stake is $90 million.

Federal spending on safe-sex programs to prevent HIV among uninfected people will be curtailed next year in favor of a new campaign to stop the spread of the virus by those who already have it, AIDS prevention groups learned Thursday.

In a conference call with more than a dozen prevention advocates, a federal health official said the government plans to invest most heavily in initiatives that offer HIV testing and counseling to infected people, several participants told The Times.

That would mark a substantial shift in priorities. At stake is some $90 million that the federal government provides to community groups for HIV prevention each year, advocates said.

"There ain't going to be any more safe-sex workshops," said Terje Anderson, executive director of the National Assn. of People with AIDS, who listened to the call from Dr. Rob Janssen, director of HIV prevention at the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "There ain't going to be any more public attitude campaigns around this."

Janssen said the changes would be completed in three weeks to six weeks and would likely take effect in July 2004, call participants said.

Janssen could not be reached by The Times for comment. A CDC spokesman, Tom Skinner, said the agency hasn't yet determined which programs would be ineligible for federal funding.

But Skinner confirmed that the agency is going to give funding priority to programs that expand HIV testing and provide individualized counseling to those who test positive and their sexual partners. These goals were outlined Thursday in the CDC's publication, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

The new strategy is aimed particularly at the more than 200,000 people who have HIV but do not know it and may be passing it to others unwittingly.

The conference call with prevention groups came one day after CDC Director Dr. Julie L. Gerberding told The Times that efforts aimed at high-risk uninfected people appear to be stalled, with the number of new HIV infections hovering at about 40,000 per year for the last decade.

Leading AIDS groups criticized what they described as a sudden shift in national health policy.

Ronald Johnson, associate executive director of Gay Men's Health Crisis in New York, said he is worried that the CDC is making a "significant movement" away from programs aimed at HIV-negative people "to the point of not even funding such programs."

Daniel Montoya, director of government affairs for AIDS Project Los Angeles, agreed.

"I think it is shortsighted in some ways," Montoya said. "Unless you are doing comprehensive prevention, in terms of looking at people who are at risk and not just look at those who are already infected, we may have another epidemic on our hands 10 years down the road."

Some prevention advocates said the CDC's strategy is aimed at an elusive group of people who, even if they are identified, the government isn't offering any extra money to treat them. Many of the people who don't know about their infection are believed to be minorities with little access to health care or knowledge that they are at risk.

Anderson of the National Assn. of People with AIDS said he believes the CDC may be using the guise of expanded testing as a way to dodge the criticism it has received from conservative politicians about safe-sex programs.

"This gets rid of the lightning rod," Anderson said. "It's just a backdoor way of defunding some of these interventions that have been so controversial."

Safe-sex campaigns have become increasingly controversial since President Bush took office, because of their sexually explicit content. The government has launched a nationwide series of audits on HIV prevention groups to see if they are properly spending federal dollars and adhering to regulations.

One of the most publicized audits was aimed at the Stop AIDS Project, based in San Francisco, which held workshops called "Booty Call" and "Great Sex." After initially saying the group may have violated federal guidelines, inspectors concluded this year that the organization was complying.


030418
LT030411


Copyright © 2003 - Los Angeles Times. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Los Angeles Times, Permissions, Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90053.  http://www.latimes.com.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2003. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2003. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .