Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 1995. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
The Times Mirror Company, Los Angeles Times Thursday, December 21, 1995, Home Edition SECTION: METRO; PAGE: B-8 TYPE: Editorial
What can account for the failure to adhere to some of the most basic safety requirements? Where was the oversight? Missing in action-- again-- at the beleaguered public hospital.
Before the transfusion, the blood had already been determined to be HIV-positive and had been set aside for quarantine. Somehow Clemons received the contaminated blood.
Accidental transfusions of tainted blood were common 10 years ago, before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration took strong steps to safeguard the nation's blood supply. Eventually, the accidents almost disappeared.
In the King / Drew case, federal and county investigators have blamed human error and criticized the hospital's blood bank for a number of problems,including poor management, inadequate training, overwork, understaffing and staff bickering and other failures in communication. Investigators also determined that hospital officials had ignored written warnings from a blood bank supervisor that the transfusion service was understaffed and operating "in the Dark Ages." In addition, the American Assn. of Blood Banks, which reviews blood bank operations, reported deficiencies that went uncorrected.
Los Angeles County supervisors are outraged at this tragedy, the latest of a string of failings at King / Drew. Clearly, the county must hold King management accountable and change the institutional culture that allowed this mistake. The nurse who accidentally released the blood has been allowed to resign. Several others have lost pay, been suspended or demoted. Stronger punishments would increase accountability throughout the hospital.
The patient who received the tainted blood in 1994 was not the only one who got blood that had tested positive for HIV. Luckily for the other person, the blood received turned out to not contain HIV; the test had been a "false positive."
Clemons, who is already showing symptoms of AIDS, has sued the county for $1.5 million. Obviously the county--and that means the taxpayer--owes her. King/Drew has been the subject of numerous investigations over health and patient safety issues. Aleta Clemons' horrible case is one that came to public attention through a Times article. What else is going on at public hospitals that county taxpayers don't know about?
Copyright 1995/The Times Mirror Company. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Permissions Desk, The Los Angeles Times, Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90053.
951221
LT951215
Copyright © 1995 - Los Angeles Times. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Los Angeles Times, Permissions, Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90053. http://www.latimes.com.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1995. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 1995. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .