AEGiS-LT: Clinic Will Pay $85,000 in HIV Discrimination Suit Litigation: The case is the first such action filed under federal Americans With Disabilities Act.

Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 1993. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.

Clinic Will Pay $85,000 in HIV Discrimination Suit Litigation: The case is the first such action filed under federal Americans With Disabilities Act.

Los Angeles Times (LT) - WEDNESDAY December 1, 1993 Edition: Home Edition Page: 34 Pt. A Col. 5 Word Count: 291
Scott Hadly; Times Staff Writer

A Ventura medical clinic that refused treatment to a man infected with the AIDS virus agreed Tuesday to pay $85,000 to settle a federal discrimination lawsuit.

Civil rights lawyers said the lawsuit, which was settled the day it was set to go to trial in federal court in Los Angeles, was the first AIDS discrimination lawsuit filed under the federal Americans With Disabilities Act.

Attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union and the Western Law Center for Disability Rights, who represented the man denied treatment, contend that the settlement delivers a warning to doctors across the nation.

"This sends an important message that AIDS discrimination is unlawful and won't be tolerated," said ACLU attorney Jon Davidson.

Salvador Fuentes filed the discrimination suit in March, 1992, a month after he was refused treatment at the Ventura Urgent Care Center for a laceration from a broken glass. He received the cut while washing dishes in his Ventura home.

Before he arrived at the clinic, Fuentes called for directions, informed clinic staff that he was HIV-positive and was told he could still receive care, the suit says.

But when he arrived, Dr. Thelma Reich told Fuentes that the clinic would not treat him for his wound, the suit said.

Fuentes demanded that Reich put her refusal in writing before he would leave. She wrote on the back of a prescription slip: "This is to inform you that I do not treat patients with HIV-positive in our clinic. Advised to go to County ER for treatment."

Reich, who no longer works at the clinic, admitted no wrongdoing in settling the suit.

"This is definitely not about discrimination," said James Castle, Reich's attorney. "She exercised her medical judgment that she was potentially at risk from his blood."

Keywords: CLINICS--SUITS; SETTLEMENTS; ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; DISCRIMINATION

931201
LT931205

Copyright © 1993 - Los Angeles Times. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Los Angeles Times, Permissions, Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90053. http://www.latimes.com.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1993. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 1993. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .