Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 1988. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
LOS ANGELES TIMES (LT) - THURSDAY October 6, 1988 Edition: Home Edition Section: Metro Page: 6 Pt. 2 Col. 1 Story Type: Editorial Word Count: 418
The importance of the legislation attracted strong support for the bills, with a vote of 87 to 4 in the Senate and 367 to 13 in the House. The need for broader federal action was made clear in the final report of the Presidential Commission on the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Epidemic issued last June by its chairman, Adm. James D. Watkins.
But there remains a minority that would like to see nothing done or very little done. And their power is enhanced by the limited amount of time left as Congress presses for adjournment in the next week. Even if a floor vote circumvents the refusal of unanimous consent, there would remain the threat of a filibuster in the Senate.
Neither bill includes the particular priority cited by the Presidential Commission, a federal prohibition of discrimination against those with AIDS and those who test positive with HIV, the AIDS-causing virus. That is an omission that calls for prompt remedy in the next session of Congress. But there are important elements in the two bills that have passed. Each has its particular merits. A compromise conference measure, bringing together the best of both bills, is clearly in the public interest.
Among the most important elements that should be included are broadened research, education, counseling and testing, with appropriate protections for the confidential handling of test results, and new regulations to facilitate disclosure of test results to persons at risk. A demonstration program in providing community-based and home health care is part of the Senate bill and deserves inclusion in the conference bill. Both bills also reflect wisdom on the part of large majorities of the members of Congress who rejected extreme proposals that would have wasted resources and handicapped the on-going public-health programs.
The Senate leadership must now demonstrate its sense of priorities, resisting moves to use the adjournment pressure to kill this legislation. This is an opportunity to take some useful steps ahead in the struggle to control AIDS. Delay can only raise the risks of the pandemic.
881006
LT881003
Copyright © 1988 - Los Angeles Times. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Los Angeles Times, Permissions, Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90053. http://www.latimes.com.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1988. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 1988. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .