Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 1988. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
LOS ANGELES TIMES (LT) - SATURDAY July 30, 1988 Edition: Home Edition Section: ONE Page: 15 Pt. 1 Col. 1 Word Count: 340
Victor F. Zonana; Times Staff Writer
The Nov. 8 ballot measure "threatens to destroy a model system of AIDS prevention and care in California that is succeeding," said Timothy Wolfred, executive director of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation, which hosted a press conference to kick off a statewide campaign against the initiative.
The measure would eliminate anonymous testing centers for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the suspected AIDS virus, and would force physicians to report to health authorities the names of people who test positive for the virus. Doctors would also be required to report the name of anyone they "believe" to be infected with the virus.
The measure would also mandate extensive contact tracing and notification programs by county health departments. Such programs would divert millions of dollars from AIDS education and treatment efforts, "while turning our health departments into detective agencies," American Civil Liberties Union attorney Matthew Coles charged.
Test Applicants
In addition, Proposition 102 would permit insurance companies to test applicants for HIV and screen out those who test positive. The result, Coles said, is that "all of the medical care costs of anyone who is HIV-positive would be shifted from the private sector to the public sector, potentially bankrupting public hospitals."
"I can't speak strongly enough against Proposition 102," said Dr. David Werdegar, San Francisco city and county health director.
San Francisco's AIDS education efforts, coupled with its anonymous testing and counseling programs, "have reduced the rate of new HIV infection to close to zero," Werdegar said. The Dannemeyer measure would "undermine all we are doing" by driving infected populations away from the health-care system.
"Like Lyndon LaRouche, Dannemeyer has chosen a punitive and political response to a medical crisis," added Benjamin Schatz, director of the AIDS Civil Rights Project, noting that the California Medical Assn. has already gone on record against the measure.
Copyright © 1988 - Los Angeles Times. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Los Angeles Times, Permissions, Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90053. http://www.latimes.com.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1988. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 1988. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .