Inter Press Service - October 25, 2004
Analysis by Moyiga Nduru
JOHANNESBURG, Oct 25 (IPS) - Voters in Botswana go to the polls this week to elect a new parliament and local government. The diamond-rich nation will become the first to test a new electoral code of conduct adopted by the Southern African Development Community in August.
In many respects, however, this will simply be a dress rehearsal for the tougher challenges that the code is certain to face in the months ahead.
Entitled 'Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections', the code received the endorsement of regional leaders during a summit of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) held on the Indian Ocean island of Mauritius.
It calls for adherence to internationally accepted norms such as allowing all parties to campaign freely, ensuring equal access to the state media and establishing impartial electoral institutions.
Even though South African President Thabo Mbeki warned in August that SADC member states which disregarded the code could find themselves excluded from the grouping, concern has nonetheless expressed that the guidelines will ultimately not prove enforceable.
"When you read the document you find that SADC is both the player and the referee. It's like telling students at the end of the term to set their own examination, write it and mark it," says Khabele Matlosa of the Johannesburg-based Electoral Institute of Southern Africa (EISA).
Although SADC, the African Union, the Commonwealth and the United Nations will be sending observers to Botswana, an uneventful poll is predicted for the country. The European Union (EU), for its part, has decided against bringing in monitors. Instead, resident diplomatic staff from various EU countries will cast an eye over proceedings on Saturday.
The real test of the SADC electoral code lies elsewhere, possible in the parliamentary elections that are scheduled to be held in Zimbabwe by the end of March next year.
Both the 2000 parliamentary and 2002 presidential poll in that country took place under a cloud, preceded as they were by widespread violence - most of it directed against the opposition Movement for Democratic Change. The state media in Zimbabwe were also openly biased towards the ruling ZANU-PF party.
While a full complement of election observers was on hand to monitor the 2000 vote, the head of the EU mission for the 2002 poll, Pierre Schori, had his visa to Zimbabwe cancelled ahead of the presidential election. The EU later responded to polling irregularities in Zimbabwe by imposing sanctions on Harare.
The Commonwealth team of monitors, which remained in the country, failed to give the 2002 vote a clean bill of health.
Reports say that Harare has agreed to set up an independent electoral commission and increase the number of polling stations for the upcoming election, amongst other measures. However, officials have some way to go before Zimbabwe is squarely in accord with the SADC electoral code.
Mozambican general elections, scheduled for Dec. 1 and 2, may also provide a challenge to efforts at establishing electoral transparency in the region.
Reports from the capital, Maputo, indicate that the country's National Elections Commission has agreed to have observers monitor the initial count of votes at polling stations. However, it has refused to allow them direct monitoring of the subsequent tabulation of results at provincial - and ultimately national level.
This is despite the fact that the majority of opposition allegations of vote rigging in an earlier poll apparently referred to the tallies done at provincial and national level.
Last week, the elections commission stated that a window would be placed in the main electoral centre which would allow observers to view voting results being entered into computers. However, this is not the type of "hands on" monitoring that will occur at polling stations.
A spokesperson for the commission, Filipe Mandlate, has been quoted as saying that Mozambican law does not explicitly state that observers can be present at provincial and national counts. Equally, however, the law does not appear to outlaw their presence - and the EU is pressing to have its observers admitted to all phases of the counting process.
"There is no need to close the door (to foreign observers)," Matlosa says. "If SADC countries adhered to electoral procedures, then foreign observers would bar themselves as they did in South Africa (during elections in April)."
"Don't force observers to become a choir - singing the same song," he adds.
Even as experts debate the SADC code, Botswana nationals who live overseas and are eligible to vote have already begun casting their ballots.
According to the country's Independent Electoral Commission, some 2,430 nationals stationed in Australia, Belgium, China, Ethiopia, Japan, Kenya, Namibia, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, Britain and United States will vote before Saturday's poll.
About 2,000 voting stations have reportedly been established in Botswana itself to enable citizens to elect 57 members of parliament and 490 local government representatives.
While Botswana currently enjoys a healthy economy, its population of about 1.6 million suffers from having the second-highest HIV prevalence rate in the world.
According to the Gaborone-based African Comprehensive HIV/AIDS Partnership, an estimated 38.5 percent of people aged 15 to 49 are infected with the AIDS virus.
This prevalence rate, serious by any measure, is still more worrying when one considers that 68 percent of Botswana's population is less than 29 years old.
041025
IP041012
Copyright © 2004 - Inter Press Service. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Inter Press Service, IPS-ONLINE, World Desk via Panisperna 207 00184 Rome, Italy. Email: info@ips.org http://www.ips.org
AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Elton John AIDS Foundation, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2004. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2004. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .