HEALTH: Debate Rages Anew Over Origin of AIDS Inter Press Service
click here to return to Inter Press Service main menu
DonateNow
Print this Article


HEALTH: Debate Rages Anew Over Origin of AIDS

Inter Press Service - December 1, 1999
Marwaan Macan-Markar


MEXICO CITY, Dec 1 (IPS) - The long-held belief that the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) began in Africa has been challenged by a British writer, sparking off a fresh debate on the origins of the disease.

In his recent book, "The River: A Journey Back To The Source Of HIV And AIDS," Edward Hooper put forward the provocative theory that AIDS actually was introduced to the African continent by Western medicine.

According to Hooper, this happened during the tests for a polio vaccine, conducted in the 1950s and 1960s in certain parts of East and Central Africa by Western medical researchers.

Hooper suspects that the vaccine used in the CHAT experimental programme accidentally had been contaminated by a monkey virus that had traces of the simian immunodeficiency virus.

This is not the first time that such a theory has been propounded; an article in the US-based magazine "Rolling Stone" made the same charge in 1992 and Hooper's critics have turned to the research that followed that article to dismiss his conclusions.

At that time, says Lisa Jacobs of the UN's joint programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), the scientific community was intrigued by the "incredible hypothesis," and the validity of the theory was put to test.

"The result was that there were too many holes to make it a useful theory," she adds.

The same was true of Hooper's book, Jacobs says. "Most experts, who base their opinions on scientific grounds, believe Hooper's theory to be highly unlikely." A British newspaper published a report containing similar sentiments - that Hooper's argument has been rejected by "most of the scientific community."

The author has his defenders, however, who argue that the studies carried out after the "Rolling Stone" article appeared were partly based on a published finding that later "was shown to be in error."

And just last week, an article in a US newspaper had this to say: "Experts writing in journals have praised Mr. Hooper's diligence and scholarship, and the plausibility of the thesis."

Since it was detected by doctors in 1981, the origins of HIV/AIDS have been a mystery, and the desperate search for answers to its genesis has spawned myths and a variety of theories.

Among the more bizarre explanations was that HIV was an alien from outer space or that it was an agent of biological warfare.

Virologists, on the other hand, have settled for more plausible reasons like the one that says "a forerunner of HIV could have `jumped' species from monkeys to humans if blood from a monkey was splashed into a cut or a mucous membrane, such as the eye."

Nevertheless, states a UNAIDS release, a convincing answer has remained elusive.

The medical community does believe that HIV may have entered the human population sometime in the 1970s and that its explosive spread during the years that followed was the result of "urbanisation, cheap travel and major international conflicts increasing the potential for people from different communities to have sex with each other."

Today, the worst hit region in the world is Sub-Saharan Africa, where close to 3,800 HIV/AIDS victims are detected every day, with almost 90 percent of them having indulged in heterosexual sex.

According to a World Bank study, AIDS is taking a "devastating toll in human suffering and death in Africa."

Of the 30 million people who have contracted the disease worldwide, 63 percent are from Africa, a continent that has only 10 percent of the world's population.

The study points out that AIDS now exceeds malaria and other conditions as the leading cause of death of people aged between 15- 49 in more than 15 countries. Such devastating reality has prompted the Western medical establishment to be hostile towards research into the origins of this disease, says Bill Hamilton, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Oxford, who wrote the foreword to Hooper's book.

"It cannot bring itself to believe that a disaster of this magnitude could have been started by one of its own," he adds.

Hamilton has encountered many experts who have refused to discuss Hooper's theory in public.

"Only recently a colleague said that he supposed there might be truth in the theory but he wasn't going to publish anything on it. He went on to say that he would lose his grant from the medical research body that supports him," he reveals.

What impressed Hamilton about Hooper's story was "the synchronization of time and place."

"None of the facts amounts to proof but taken together, the trend and accumulation is impressive. At least the OPV (oral polio vaccine) theory of the origins of AIDS now merits our attention," he stresses.

In his book, Hooper throws out a challenge to test his conclusions. He wants one of the known samples of the suspected batch of vaccines still preserved at the US-based Wistar Institute to be tested to see if it contains HIV or traces of the simian virus.

To achieve that, however, will require more convincing on Hooper's part. For one, the Institute has been reluctant to authorise the release of the CHAT sample and, on the other, Hooper had been informed by an official of the World Health Organisation that the origins of AIDS was "certainly of no interest today." (END/IPS/mmm/mk/99)
991201
IP991202


Copyright © 1999 - Inter Press Service. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Inter Press Service, IPS-ONLINE, World Desk via Panisperna 207 00184 Rome, Italy. Email: info@ips.org  http://www.ips.org

AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Elton John AIDS Foundation, iMetrikus, Inc., John M. Lloyd Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1999. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 1999. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .