Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 2005. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Mail & Guardian (Johannesburg) - December 9, 2005
Marlise Richter**
My puzzlement deepens when I participate in feminist forums and encounter the women's movement's apparent complacency on HIV. I observe how activities for the 16 Days of Activism campaign and World Aids Day get under way and I wonder gloomily about the rest of the days that make up 2006, 2010, 2015.
My starting point for any gender issue in South Africa is that HIV hangs over it like a dark, menacing cloud and that all discussions about gender should include a focus on HIV. Yet it would seem few feminists are thinking along similar lines. And I cannot fathom why.
Statistics on HIV/Aids are overwhelming. Feminists in particular should be propelled into furious action. There should be symbolic citizens' arrests of the Minister of Health Manto Tshabalala-Msimang while she unsuspectingly tends her vegetable garden. Gender and HIV issues should be raised at every dining and boardroom table and public officials, politicians, trade unions and employers should be challenged on what they are doing to reduce the risk of HIV to women. Marches, pickets and rallies should take place whenever President Thabo Mbeki professes that he has never met someone with HIV.
But feminist voices are sadly absent. In this silence, a number of possibilities present themselves.
Is it possible that feminists may not be fully aware of the links between HIV and their commitments? Are the close and devastating relationships between HIV and gender-based violence, the private/public division, access to justice, land, politics and social security not fully appreciated? Or are feminists under the dangerous misapprehension that the struggle on HIV/Aids is over?
Now that South Africa has public-sector programmes on anti- retroviral treatment, prevention of mother-to-child transmission and post-exposure prophylaxis after rape, has attention on HIV/Aids become unnecessary?
Do feminists believe that HIV/Aids is too "political", too "controversial"? I particularly wonder about the Commission for Gender Equality's and the Human Rights Commission's lack of vigour in engaging government obstreperousness on gender and HIV.
It might be worthwhile to call for and cultivate a form of "Aids feminism". Instead of approaching HIV through the lens of general feminist concerns, the pandemic and its amplified effects on women should be foregrounded. Progressive Aids advocacy and activism should be initiated and supported, and enthusiastic endeavours to engender mainstream Aids responses should be evident at all levels.
The underlying problems of Aids are obviously of general feminist concern and advancing women's empowerment will, of course, diminish the impact of HIV. But this focus is too oblique and not nearly enough.
The Aids crisis necessitates a blazing, outspoken feminist response that includes challenging the slow implementation of anti- retrovirals, the preposterous levels of gender-based violence, the deficient care of rape survivors, the far-reaching implications of the prevention of mother-to-child transmission programme and the hopelessly inadequate prevention responses to the ways in which young women and girls contract HIV.
Perhaps, if we work hard and are lucky, when the "16 days" are over on December 10, their momentum may have spawned an Aids-feminist movement that will push the HIV/Aids agenda forward with fervent vigour.
** Marlise Richter is a researcher at the Aids Law Project at Wits University and is a volunteer with the Treatment Action Campaign
051209
MG051206
Copyright © 2005 - Daily Mail & Guardian. For information about the content or for permission to redistribute, publish or use for broadcast, contact the publisher.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2005. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2005. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .