Chicago Tribune - October 7, 2006

The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is urging states to change that. It wants to make HIV testing as routine as a cholesterol screening. The CDC's aim is to encourage testing of all patients between ages 13 and 64 when they visit a doctor's office or hospital. An estimated one-quarter of the 1 million Americans living with HIV don't know they have it.

A diagnosis of HIV need not be a death sentence. There are drugs to control the disease--and the sooner you know you have it, the better your chances of slowing the progress of the illness. Not only that, but studies show that someone who knows he or she is infected is far less likely to spread the disease. The CDC says that greater testing could help reduce the spread of HIV by more than 30 percent, since studies show that carriers cut back on high-risk behavior once they learn of the infection.

Implicit in the CDC's stance is this powerful notion: The stigma of HIV has faded so much that those who have the virus no longer need special protections.

But has it? Some who work in this field say that the stigma remains and that pretest counseling and other measures are crucial for those who receive this dreaded diagnosis. "This is a diagnosis that will turn your life upside down," says Ann Fisher, executive director of the AIDS Legal Council of Chicago. She's right, of course.

Some advocates agree with the CDC on more widespread testing, and even some streamlined procedures, but not the scrapping of explicit written consent from the patient. They fear the CDC's proposal will result in "stealth" testing--with people being screened without their full and written consent.

The CDC's proposal isn't binding, but it is likely to be highly influential. It's important to note that the CDC is not recommending mandatory screening. People could "opt out," or choose not to take it.

In Illinois, the law requires pretest counseling and that patients be informed of HIV test results face-to-face. That makes sense. Doctors and public health officials should encourage broader testing for HIV. It should be routinely recommended to those who have not been tested. But that should be done while preserving the counseling and reporting rules in place in the state.

The stigma of HIV-AIDS has diminished but has by no means vanished. An opt-out policy, if it were to be started, shouldn't be taken to mean that health professionals could dispense with the care and sensitivity people deserve when deciding to be tested--or learning they have HIV.
061007
CT061002

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2006. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2006. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .