AEGiS-Bangkok Post: Compulsory Patents Debate: Dept denies seekingruling on licensing Bangkok PostImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 2007. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Bangkok Post main menu
DonateNow
Print this article

Compulsory Patents Debate: Dept denies seekingruling on licensing

Bangkok Post - February 15, 2007
Apiradee Treerutkuarkul


The Intellectual Property Department yesterday denied it had sought a ruling on the Public Health Ministry's decision to enforce compulsory licensing on drugs.

Department chief Puangrat Asavapisit told Aids activists led by the Aids Access Foundation, Doctors without Borders and non-government organisations that the agency had not sought advice from the Council of State, but the department was considering legal arguments raised by pharmaceutical firms.

Drug manufacturers have questioned Thailand's decision, asking whether it flouted drug patents.

The department would mediate if the Public Health Ministry and multinational drug companies could not settle the issue, he said.

The Public Health Ministry said it would impose compulsory licences for the import and production of generic versions of anti-retroviral Aids drug Efavirenz, and Kaletra, and Plavix, which are heart disease drugs.

Nimit Tienudom, director of the Aids Access Foundation, said activists opposed any move to ask the Council of State, the state's legal arm, whether the government could issue patent-overriding licences for generic versions of heart and HIV/Aids pills. They met the department chief yesterday to pass on the message.

"Thailand has been praised the world over for taking the bold step of issuing compulsory licences for expanding public access to drugs. Any drug companies feeling that their intellectual property rights are violated should take a case to the Administrative Court," he said.

Merck & Co, patent holder of Aids drug Efavirenz, last month asked the Commerce Ministry, which oversees the department, to start talks between the company and the Public Health Ministry over the ministry's plan.

Mr Nimit said the Intellectual Property Department should not be doing the drug firms' bidding, by pushing for a legal opinion. Instead, it should try to settle on an acceptable royalty fee which the state must pay the patented drug holder when compulsory licensing is imposed.

Under that regime, the drug patent owner is eligible to receive a royalty fee of up to 5% of the market value of its product.


070215
BP070209


Copyright © 2007 - The Bangkok Post. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Bangkok Post.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Roche and Trimeris, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2007. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2007. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .