Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 2005. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
BBC News - December 19, 2005
The two men have been granted legal aid on public interest grounds to take the government to court over the policy on post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP).
A month-long course of PEP, which uses anti-retroviral drugs, can cut the risk of infection after exposure.
One of the pair passed the virus to the other after a condom split, but they say they were unaware of the treatment.
PEP is routinely given to healthcare workers accidentally exposed to HIV at work and is made available to rape victims through police referral. To be most effective, it must be given immediately after exposure.
It is also available on a case-by-case basis for those exposed through consensual sex, although the couple argue the public and doctors are not aware of this.
The pair, aged 35 and 26, from the south east of England, are expected to call for a major campaign to raise awareness about the treatment.
Their solicitor, Frances Swaine, of Leigh, Day and Co, said: "The case is being brought to raise awareness about PEP.
"The problem is people do not know about it and if they did they would struggle to find a doctor who would give it to them.
"What we are saying is that there needs to be guidelines on PEP and a campaign to tell people about it. That is not to say everyone should have access to it, it would be up to clinical judgement to decide that."
The drugs are extremely toxic and the side-effects can include nausea, headache, diarrhoea and vomiting, but Ms Swaine said most people would prefer to put up with that rather than risk infection with HIV.
The Department of Health said there was little evidence that PEP was effective in cases other than "needle-stick" injuries to health care workers, but individual doctors could still prescribe the drugs.
A spokeswoman added: "PEP is not a substitute for safer sex and condom use continues to be the main HIV prevention message."
The case is likely to be heard at the High Court in the new year.
051219
BB051229
Copyright © 2005 - BBC. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the BBC.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Elton John AIDS Foundation UK, the National Library of Medicine, AIDS Walk of Orange County, and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2005. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2005. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content.
.