Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 2003. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
BBC News - Monday, 17 November, 2003
Mr Powell told the BBC that the Bush administration was not backtracking on its commitment to spend $15bn on Aids over the next five years.
He said Aids was a national security issue, because it tore countries apart.
And he defended plans to spend one-third of the money on programmes promoting sexual abstinence.
Mr Powell's comments, in an exclusive BBC interview, came amid concern that President George W Bush has asked Congress to appropriate just $2.1bn for fighting Aids in 2004.
The BBC's Michael Buchanan in Washington says most people had assumed the president would spend $3bn a year on the anti-Aids initiative.
But Mr Powell said the US was committed to spending every cent of the $15bn.
He said: "We expect Congress to appropriate it and we will spend it, because there's a desperate need out there for it."
Responsibility
The US secretary of state also rejected suggestions that it was unrealistic to allocate one-third of the money to programmes that promoted abstinence from sex.
He said: "Abstinence works, we know it works. If you're not actually transmitting the disease through sexual conduct, the disease will not be transmitted."
However, Mr Powell stressed that sexual abstinence was being promoted as part of a comprehensive approach to HIV and Aids that also included education, promotion of safe sex and condoms, treatment programmes and research into a cure.
"Abstinence is a good thing to teach young people before they're ready for the responsibilities of sexual activity," he said.
Mr Powell said the HIV/Aids epidemic was threatening the viability of some countries: "It leaves families totally torn apart, villages torn apart, and in due course, countries torn apart."
Vulnerable
Aids activists expressed concern at the decision to ask for only $2.1bn to fight the disease next year, saying they feared the programme could fall foul of budget cuts as the US deficit rose to new heights.
One Democrat congresswoman, Nita Lowey, said: "I think it's truly unfortunate that the President talked the talk but wasn't willing to walk the walk."
Sandra Thurman, of the International Aids Trust, said: "I do have fears that among competing priorities in the United States, with a growing deficit, that there is a huge challenge getting enough money to fund these programmes."
She added: "If we're going to increase our debt, the thing they can't stop funding are the things that matter most, and that's providing care and services to people at risk for HIV and living with Aids."
031117
BB031115
Copyright © 2003 - BBC. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the BBC.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bridgestone/Firestone Charitable Trust, Elton John AIDS Foundation UK, the National Library of Medicine, AIDS Walk of Orange County, and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2003. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2003. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content.
.