BBC News - Wednesday, 13 June, 2001
That proposal - made last year as part of a significant overhaul of Canada's immigration system - came in for sharp criticism from Aids activists and immigrant support groups.
Immigration Minister Elinor Caplan told parliament that the status of would-be immigrants who test positive in new mandatory HIV checks would be decided on a case by case basis.
Opponents of the bill say it will cost Canada almost $30m a year in additional medical costs to care for immigrants with Aids.
Canada currently admits 225,000 immigrants a year.
Relief
Seeking to allay fears of discrimination against people applying for immigration to Canada, Ms Caplan insisted that refugees and relatives of people already in Canada would still be admitted regardless of the result of medical tests.
And other instances would be decided by the provincial governments on a case by case basis, she said.
She added that the new proposals would bring Canada in line with the regional approach to the issue of immigration.
"Once someone is tested, then they have the opportunity for counselling and treatment, and that's extremely important. I think the testing policy is a thoughtful one, which is also consistent with the United States and Australia and other countries that are receiving immigrants," the minister said.
At present, only those prospective immigrants whose doctors suspect they might be suffering from HIV are tested. Health officials say around 50 to 70 potential immigrants a year are rejected after testing positive.
Costly
Inky Mark, opposition MP with the right-wing Canadian Alliance, said the new proposals would overburden the country's health care system.
He said about 200 HIV-positive immigrants allowed into Canada last year had cost the taxpayers an extra $26m.
But Ralf Juergens, head of the Canadian HIV/Aids Legal Network, said he still feared the authorities would deny entry to HIV-infected immigrants, which he described as "unjust".
"We are worried about the fact that the vast majority of people would still be excluded based on an assumption that they would create excessive demand on health and social services," he told a news conference.
The BBC's Ian Gunn says the government argues that its new policy balances public health concerns, the rights of immigrants and still protects a domestic health system that is already under financial strain.
010613
BB010616
Copyright © 2001 - BBC. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the BBC.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2001. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2001. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content.
.