Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 2005. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Bay Area Reporter - January 20, 2005
Matthew S. Bajko (Bay Area Reporter not online. To respond, send email to BARpaper@aol.com or Matthewsbajko@aol.com )
It also makes San Francisco unique, in that the country as a whole saw new HIV/AIDS diagnoses increase by 3.2 percent between 2001 and 2002. While health officials reported a slight increase among heterosexual cases and a decrease among injection 2002 numbers, San Francisco ranked 12th, falling behind Washington D.C. and Memphis.
"San Francisco has gone from being one of the most severely affected cities in terms of AIDS incidence to population to now having fallen to 12th. The leading cities have more injection drug users and heterosexual infections," explained Dr. Willi McFarland, director of the HIV/AIDS statistics, epidemiology, and intervention research section at the city's Department of Public Health. "It's not all good news, it's mixed. HIV incidence has leveled off, but at a rate that will continue to increase the number of MSM living with HIV."
As the city prepares to conduct its HIV consensus estimate this year ± the last one was conducted in 2001 ± the number of people living with HIV or AIDS is expected to stay about the same at 12,786. The number of new annual HIV infections, which had been 748, is expected to be "a little lower" said McFarland.
The numbers are a double-edged sword for the numerous AIDS agencies that work to maintain the successes San Francisco has achieved in battling the disease over the last two decades. Federal dollars that support AIDS and HIV care follow the epidemic, meaning San Francisco's piece of the funding pie is likely to continue to shrink.
America's AIDS epidemic is moving into the South, what some health officials are dubbing the "AIDS belt."
Among the top 10 cities for AIDS incidence in 2002, Miami ranked second, Baton Rouge ranked third, West Palm Beach came in fifth, Fort Lauderdale sixth, New Orleans seventh, and Columbia, South Carolina placed eighth.
Sitting in first place was New York City, an 800-pound gorilla when it comes to federal AIDS funds. Last spring, when San Francisco lost nearly $4 million in Ryan White CARE Act funding, local health officials said the drop was partly due to New York securing more funds than in years past.
In what has become a yearly report for the city's HIV Prevention Planning Council, McFarland presented the latest data and his predictions for where the city's AIDS epidemic is headed at the group's first meeting of the new year on January 13. He offered several reasons as to why health officials' fears in recent years of a resurgence in HIV have not panned out.
Their fears stemmed from rises in other sexually transmitted diseases, including syphilis and male rectal gonorrhea, both of which spiked upwards in 2000 and have continued to climb ever since. Both STDs can be a predictor for rises in HIV, for carriers are more susceptible to contracting the virus. But McFarland said that has yet to happen in San Francisco due to serosorting.
"We have seen an increase in STDs and unprotected anal sex and not have had HIV go up. This is due to networks of only positive men having sex with positive men and negative men only being with negative men," said McFarland. "If you separate out positive men, risk behavior has gone down since 2001."
The number of both positive and negative MSM reporting unprotected anal sex with a partner of the opposite serostatus has fallen in the last three years. But among men of the same HIV status, the number reporting unprotected anal sex has shot up since 2002. However, McFarland cautioned that serosorting might not be a viable HIV prevention strategy.
"It may not be a strategy over the long term that may be stable. How long will people choose someone of the same status?" he said.
050120
BR050101
Copyright © 2005 - The Bay Area Reporter. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the The Bay Area Reporter.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2005. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2005. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .