AEGiS-BAR: Mbeki's AIDS panel issues interim report Bay Area ReporterImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 2001. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Bay Area Reporter main menu
DonateNow



Mbeki's AIDS panel issues interim report

Bay Area Reporter - April 12, 2001
S. Predrag


South African President Thabo Mbeki's controversial AIDS panel has just released its interim report which shows that mainstream scientists and dissidents are firmly divided on the cause of AIDS. Or, as one analyst put it - with a large dose of sarcasm - they cannot agree between condoms and Chinese cucumbers as to the best way of fighting this disease that caused the deaths of more than 2.5 million people last year in Africa.

The 134-page document failed to resolve any of the key controversies that led to the formation of the panel more than a year ago. Among them, the most important controversy of all: does HIV cause AIDS?

The presidential panel on AIDS consisted of 33 international and local scientists, as well as other experts - divided into two camps: those who believe that HIV causes AIDS and those who fiercely dispute that contention.

The panelists met on two occasions in Pretoria in May and July of last year, in order to address the following questions:

o What causes the immune deficiency that leads to death from AIDS? o What is the most efficient response to the cause(s)?

o Why is AIDS heterosexually transmitted in sub-Saharan Africa, while it is largely homosexually transmitted in the Western world?

Addressing journalists at a press conference held on April 4 in Cape Town, Dr. Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, the South African minister of health, admitted that the panelists were sharply divided on many questions. Still, she added that, "It was not assumed at the start of the exercise that the objective was to achieve consensus."

The main stumbling block is that the mainstream scientists are insisting that massive, improved awareness campaigns, including the widespread use of condoms, as well as better blood screening and the use of antiretrovirals, can help the fight against the spread of AIDS.

On the other side, the dissident scientist members claim that better nourishment, including therapy with Chinese cucumbers, yoga, and music - and not antiretrovirals - can stop HIV-infected people from dying.

While the division among the panelists as to the cause of AIDS was fundamental, according to Tshabalala-Msimang, "Certain commonly held views did emerge on the importance of various programmatic interventions." In particular, she said, "The significant impact of developmental issues - issues such as poverty, literacy, gender relations, nutrition, sanitation - was taken into account and acknowledged in a much more far-reaching way than hitherto."

As for the use of antiretrovirals, Tshabalala-Msimang admitted that, "Views on this issue were obviously sharply divergent."

Panelists who deny a causal link between HIV and AIDS regard the use of antiretrovirals as "totally unjustifiable." However, mainstream scientists believe that antiretrovirals have positive effects, particularly when it comes to the prevention of mother-to-child transmissions of HIV.

The South African health minister praised the panelists for their work, insisting that, "The global search for answers to the many complex questions will continue and, we believe, it has been enriched and promoted by the research projects defined through the process of debate in this particular panel."

Tshabalala-Msimang, whose president has been openly linked with the AIDS dissidents and questions the cause of AIDS, concluded that, "The debates of the panel have not provided grounds for [the] government to depart from its current approach to the HIV/AIDS problem." She added that their approach remains rooted in the premise that HIV causes AIDS.

The interim report has already provoked sharp criticism. Some feel that it was an expensive exercise in futility. Others claim that it is already harming the fight against AIDS in South Africa.

"In a sense, what we have done with this long and very expensive debate is put back a lot of years' work, especially among young people," said Dr. Ashraf Grimwood, chair of the National Council on AIDS. He characterized the panel report's divisions on the link between HIV and AIDS as "a very serious situation."


010412
BR010412


Copyright © 2001 - The Bay Area Reporter. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the The Bay Area Reporter.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2001. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2001. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .