Bay Area Reporter - April 12, 2001
Bob Roehr

The budget proposes an increase of about $2.8 billion for the Department of Health and Human Services, roughly equivalent to the increase being proposed for research at the National Institutes of Health.

To compensate for that and also fund some of the administration's initiatives such as increased funding for community health centers, spending will be cut for popular programs that include disease prevention, aid to seniors, minority health, and training pediatricians. So AIDS got off better with flat funding than some other program areas.

"It sounds like all of this talk of compassionate conservatism is coming down to compassion for the wealthy with tax cuts" and not for those most in need, said Patricia Dunn, policy director of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.

Terje Anderson, executive director of the National Association of People With AIDS, said that flat funding "amounts to a cut" because it does not take into account the increased cost of living. Furthermore, the caseload of people living with HIV and dependent on government health assistance continues to grow.

"I'm alarmed, it is a very, very serious problem," said Bill Arnold, director of the ADAP Working Group, a broad coalition of those supporting the drug assistance program. He projects a $50-60 million shortfall in the AIDS drug assistance program for the operating year that began on April 1 and is seeking a supplemental appropriation.

Without the additional money, "ADAP is going to have to close its doors or reduce its current level of services by summer," he said. The state-run AIDS drug assistance programs usually have responded by cutting benefits, creating waiting lists, or restricting the formulary of approved drugs covered.

Arnold said that deaths from AIDS are down, many people are living longer, healthier lives because of combination therapy, and "that adds up to a legitimate demand for increased funding" as more people are brought under medical care. He argued that flat funding will only make current inadequacies more apparent.

Jim Driscoll, a lobbyist with the National AIDS Treatment Advocacy Project and the ADAP Working Group, said that the Bush health budget will result in "a free for all, a food fight in Congress, not just on AIDS but for everything." It is like the administration has said, "Okay guys, fight it out and see who is strongest."

He said: "The pharmaceutical industry is screwing the Republican Party" with the cost of AIDS drugs. He wouldn't be surprised to see the administration push for larger rebates on the drugs that it purchases through programs such as Medicare and the Veteran's Administration.

Steve Gunderson, an openly gay former Republican congressman from Wisconsin, believes that the budget figure is not one of malice toward AIDS but rather one of ignorance of the issues. It is compounded by the fact that so few political appointees have been named or confirmed to policy-making positions in the administration.

Winnie Stachelberg agreed. The political director of the Human Rights Campaign added, this is a new administration and "we are back to the beginning" in having to educate it on issues. She calls the president's budget just the beginning of the process.

"This is part of the reason why we have two branches of government," said Gunderson. He urged people to first try to educate the administration rather than confront it.

Anderson was expecting "something like a 4 percent increase" in the budget for HIV programs. He presumes that Congress will allow for some growth in the programs, but is unclear as to how much that might be.

Arnold predicted that the budget numbers "will energize the AIDS community right off the bat." ACT UP had scheduled a demonstration in Washington for today.

010412
BR010409

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2001. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2001. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .