AEGiS-AP: Board Sides With HIV Patient Associated PressImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 2001. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Associated Press main menu




DonateNow



Board Sides With HIV Patient

Associated Press - Wednesday November 14, 2001
Justin Pope, AP Business Writer


BOSTON (AP) - A state board ruled Wednesday that an HIV-positive man with end-stage liver disease should be covered by Medicaid for a potentially life-saving liver transplant.

The Division of Medical Assistance Board of Appeals said the procedure was "medically necessary" and not experimental. Some scientists believe that HIV reduces the chance of survival for transplant patients.

"Certainly, for all Medicaid recipients, HIV status alone can no longer be a basis to refuse liver transplantation," said attorney Bennett Klein of Gays and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders. "This decision really breaks new ground."

The ruling would only directly affect Massachusetts Medicaid recipients in similar circumstances. But, Klein said, the ruling could help make the case in other states and with private insurance companies.

HIV drugs have kept the patient from developing AIDS, but he also has hepatitis C and is expected to die of liver failure within months. The man wasn't identified, but is 41 years old and lives in Boston.

The ruling granted his request for a referral to the University of Pittsburgh transplant program. It also ordered Neighborhood Health Plan, a private company that provides health care to Medicaid recipients through a state contract, to pay for the procedure.

The man still could be denied a transplant for medical reasons. The state Division of Medical Assistance insisted the decision would not apply to all cases.

"It's not a blanket approval that all people with HIV would be automatic candidates for a transplant," spokesman Richard McGreal said. "Just because this person fits the medical necessity definition, and is approved for a liver transplant, the next person who comes along may be totally different."

NHP was involved in a similar dispute last summer when a woman who also had HIV and hepatitis and needed a liver transplant sued to force it to change its policies.

A different state panel ruled against Belynda Dunn, but she withdrew her lawsuit after receiving $100,000 in donations from the HMO and private givers to pay for the procedure.

In the latest case, the board queried experts in the field on the efficacy of liver transplants for patients with HIV and concluded that recent advances in AIDS treatment indicated "the treatment will be effective in light of his specific clinical picture."

NHP Director of Corporate Communications Deborah Reiter said the company was reviewing the ruling but had no immediate comment.


011114
AP011116


Copyright © 2001 - Associated Press. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the AP Permissions Desk.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation, and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2001. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2001. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .