AEGiS-AP: Dentist Loses in AIDS Rights Case Associated PressImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 1998. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Click here to return to Associated Press main menu




DonateNow



Dentist Loses in AIDS Rights Case

The Associated Press - Wednesday December 30, 1998
Erica Noonan, Associated Press Writer


BOSTON (AP) - A dentist lost an appeal of a ruling that he broke federal law by insisting that an HIV-infected patient go to a hospital for treatment.

The U.S. Court of Appeals found that Dr. Randon Bragdon of Bangor, Maine, violated the federal Americans With Disabilities Act by refusing to treat Sidney Abbott in his office in 1994 for fear of contracting the virus that causes AIDS.

"I wasn't really surprised because they had supported us before, but for some people living with the virus, this is what it may take for them to feel comfortable," said Abbott, 37.

Bragdon had offered to fill the woman's cavity in a hospital, which he argued would allow him to take additional precautions against being infected.

Abbott was referred to Bragdon's office by the Eastern Maine AIDS Network after Bragdon allegedly told another patient that he would not treat patients with infectious disease, including AIDS. Bragdon's lawyer said the group targeted his client because they wanted to use the incident as a test case.

Abbott refused the dentist's offer to treat her in a hospital, which would have required her to pay $185 for a procedure that would cost only $35 at the office. She eventually had the cavity filled by another dentist.

The case was a lengthy and controversial one - winding through Maine's district court, the U.S. Court of Appeals and even reaching the U.S. Supreme Court - before being sent back to the appeals court, which issued its decision Tuesday. According to federal law, Bragdon may also be held liable for Abbott's legal fees which are likely to top $300,000.

Bragdon was unavailable for comment, but his attorney, John W. McCarthy, said his client will likely ask the Supreme Court to re-evaluate the case. Last June, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that people with HIV are protected by the landmark 1990 discrimination act, except if they pose "a direct threat to the health and safety of others."
981230
AP981221


Copyright © 1998 - Associated Press. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the AP Permissions Desk.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation, and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1998. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 1998. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .