agence france-presse
click here to return to agence france-presse main menu
DonateNow



HIV drugs: When three is better than two, but four is no better than three...

Agence France-Presse - August 13, 2006


TORONTO, Aug 13, 2006 (AFP) - Hopes that taking a combination of four antiretroviral drugs might provide a revolutionary new weapon against HIV are false, according to a study released at the world AIDS conference here.

Over the past 15 years, researchers first discovered that taking two anti-HIV drugs was more effective than taking one, and then learnt that taking three -- the famous "triple cocktail" -- was better than two.

Combination therapy quickly suppressed levels of HIV in the blood, boosted levels of CD4 immune cells, delayed the clinical progression to AIDS and improved a patient's chances of survival, they found.

That success, while still not a cure for HIV, bred hopes that using four drugs in a combination could be even more effective. By acting faster, it could usefully reduce the time lag that enables a virus to mutate and thwart the medication.

But a study presented Sunday at the 16th International AIDS Conference found no difference between four-drug and three-drug combinations.

Roy Gulick of Weill Medical College of New York's Cornell University, who led the research, recruited 765 patients who were newly diagnosed with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) but had not previously received treatment.

Half were given a standard triple therapy (AZT, epivir and efavirenz) and the other half followed a four-drug regimen, comprising the same treatments plus abacavir, commercialised as Ziagen.

Over the three years of the study, 26 percent of the patients on the three-drug regimen met with "virologic failure," meaning that they eventually had to switch to different drugs in order to continue suppress HIV.

Among the four-drug regimen, the failure rate was 25 percent.

"We found no significant differences," said the study. "(...) Adding abacavir as a fourth drug to the standard initial three-drug regimen did not change toxicity or adherence but provided no additional benefit."

060813
AF060841


Copyright ©AFP 2006. All Rights Reserved. AFP articles contained on the AEGiS web site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without AFP's prior written permission. You may make one copy of each article for your personal, non-commercial use only; more copies would require AFP's prior written permission. obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP photos or materials. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP stories, photos or graphics.  http://www.afp.com/

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Bridgestone Firestone Trust Fund, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2006. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

©1990, 2006 - AEGiS. AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content.