UNITED STATES: The NYC Condom: Use and Acceptability of New York City's Branded Condom CDC Daily UpdateImportant note: Information in this article was accurate in 2009. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.

Click here to return to CDC Daily Update main menu





DonateNow



UNITED STATES: The NYC Condom: Use and Acceptability of New York City's Branded Condom

American Journal of Public Health Vol. 99; No. 12: P. 2178- 2180 (12..09) - Friday, November 13, 2009
Ryan C. Burke, MPH; Juliet Wilson, MSc; Kyle T. Bernstein, PhD, MPH; Nicholas Grosskopf, EdD, CHES; Christopher Murrill, PhD, MPH; Blayne Cutler, MD, PhD; Monica Sweeney, MD; Elizabeth M. Begier, MD, MPH


In a high-profile media campaign launched on Feb. 14, 2007, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) introduced the "NYC Condom." This male condom - a standard-size, lubricated Lifestyles brand - was the first specially packaged condom unique to a municipality. The department distributed 5 million of the condoms to city organizations and businesses during the first month, and since has distributed an average of 3.4 million condoms each month. The researchers undertook the current study of sexually active New Yorkers "to measure awareness of and experience with the NYC Condom, and demand for and experience with other male condoms."

From July through September 2007, the researchers conducted a street intercept survey at seven large public events in the city where attendees were mainly persons of color and gay persons. City residents age 18 and older were eligible to participate. A time-space sampling methodology was used; respondents were offered a $4 transit card as an incentive.

In all, 933 people were approached; 464 answered screening questions; and 293 met all criteria for inclusion. Most participants (76 percent) had seen or heard of the condom, of whom 75 percent had picked one up. Among those who had acquired an NYC Condom, 68.5 percent had used it.

Respondents who had used the NYC Condom were asked to rate it on a scale of 1 (much worse than other male condoms) to 10 (much better). The resulting average rating was 6.55. Respondents were then asked what additional types of condoms they would like the department to provide. The most often named varieties were ultra-thin/extra-sensitive (22 percent), extra-strength (18 percent), and larger-size (14 percent).

"These results indicate that condom social marketing campaigns can successfully translate into condom use," the authors wrote. "Although this is the first large-scale condom distribution campaign conducted in a US city, other campaigns have documented that distributing free condoms promotes use."

"Data on use, acceptability, and preferences for various condom types can guide program planning and development," the authors concluded. "On the basis of these results, DOHMH began distributing alternative condoms in November 2008, including this study's most frequently named types: ultra-thin/extra- sensitive, extra-strength, and larger-size."
091113
AD091954


Copyright © 2009 - Information, Inc., Bethesda, MD. The CDC National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention provides the following information as a public service only. Providing synopses of key scientific articles and lay media reports on HIV/AIDS, other sexually transmitted diseases and tuberculosis does not constitute CDC endorsement. This daily update also includes information from CDC and other government agencies, such as background on Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) articles, fact sheets, press releases and announcements. Reproduction of this text is encouraged; however, copies may not be sold, and the CDC HIV/STD/TB Prevention News Update should be cited as the source of the information. Contact the sources of the articles abstracted below for full texts of the articles.

AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2009. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 2009. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content.

.