The San Francisco Examiner; June 4, 1998
Eun Lee Koh, Examiner Washington Bureau
Researchers from UC-San Francisco and Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore found that a larger proportion of women and minorities than white men sought treatment for HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, after their immune system had already broken down.
Dr. Paul Volberding, professor of medicine at UC-San Francisco, said poorer patients tended to put off treatment to avoid early medical costs until they began experiencing symptoms.
Women and minorities infected with HIV are generally poorer than infected white men.
"Early in the disease, there's almost no physical change to the body," Volberding said. "Patients mistakenly believe that just because they seem healthy, they don't need to be treated right away."
According to the study, released Wednesday, 36 percent of women, 42 percent of blacks and 43 percent of Latinos waited until their T-cell counts had dipped below 500 to seek treatment, while only 27 percent of white men waited that long.
T-cells are white blood cells that protect the body against diseases.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommends treating AIDS patients before their T-cell count dips below 500, but many of the patients who delayed treatment had T-cells below the recommended level. Healthy people have more than 1,000 T-cells per 1 milliliter of blood.
The study did not examine the causes for the disparity, but researchers suggested that economics probably played a large role in the difference in the quality of AIDS treatment that patients receive.
In order to slow the breakdown of the immune system, Volberding said a patient should seek treatment immediately after being diagnosed with HIV.
The study also found that 76 percent of women, 68 percent of blacks and 65 percent of Hispanics infected with HIV sought care from physicians who did not specialize in AIDS treatment, compared with 54 percent of white men who did.
John Bartlett, chief of infectious diseases at the Johns Hopkins medical school, said physicians with little experience in AIDS treatment tended to offer their patients "second-best" treatment options.
The Health and Human Services Department recommends fighting HIV with at least three different types of medicine to slow the virus in its attack of the immune system. But some doctors in the survey said they had prescribed only one.
"The disparity in the treatment of HIV, especially for particular populations, signals an urgent need to educate physicians and patients more aggressively," Volberding said.
Volberding said delayed treatment could lead to earlier death because the disease became harder to treat once it developed into full-blown AIDS and the immune system started breaking down. There is no cure for AIDS.
980604
SE980602
Copyright © 1998 - San Francisco Examiner. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the San Francisco Examiner, Permissions Desk, 110 Fifth Street, P.O. Box 7260, San Franciso, CA 94120.
AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Elton John AIDS Foundation, iMetrikus, Inc., John M. Lloyd Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1998. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 1998. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .