Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 2009. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Los Angeles Times - January 27, 2009
President Bush's long campaign to preach abstinence instead of providing information and access to family planning, both domestically and overseas, was already beginning to implode when Congress refused to continue funding abstinence-only sex education in U.S. schools, which has been shown in numerous studies to be ineffective.
And although Bush supported a laudable program to provide AIDS treatment in Africa, he spent more money there promoting marital fidelity than condoms, and kept the funding flat for contraception that would have prevented AIDS transmission and unwanted pregnancies among women already ill from HIV infection. Meanwhile, any nonprofit that so much as suggested abortion to desperate women overseas, or that gave referrals to abortion providers, could receive no U.S. money, even if such services were paid for by other sources.
These funding priorities reflected a stubborn refusal to acknowledge the conditions confronting women in Africa and other poor regions -- millions of them married off each year before the age of 18, with no control over whether their husbands use condoms or engage in extramarital sex.
The Bush administration also refused to support the U.N. Population Fund, which provides maternal health and family planning services in 141 nations, based on accusations that the fund backed or participated in coerced abortions in China. This continued even after a State Department investigation found no evidence of such backing.
We're glad to see the pendulum swing back again, and we expect this to be just a first step toward correcting years of ineffective, moralistic policies that sought to roll back reproductive rights at the expense of women's health. Access to safe and legal abortion is one of those rights; better yet, when women have ready and affordable access to contraception, abortion rates drop. The best scenario would be congressional action that positions this country for the long term to favor global health over ideological convictions.
090127
LT090107
Copyright © 2009 - Los Angeles Times. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Los Angeles Times, Permissions, Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90053. http://www.latimes.com.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2009. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2009. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .