Important note: Information in this article was accurate in 2006. The state of the art may have changed since the publication date.
Los Angeles Times - November 15, 2006
Elizabeth Mehren, elizabeth.mehren@latimes.com
The decision Tuesday by the state Public Health Council makes Massachusetts a part of a national trend toward name-based reporting of HIV/AIDS cases. The move also allows the state to receive federal AIDS funds that are contingent upon recording names, as part of a broad national effort to track the epidemic and its treatment.
"This is a forced choice," said Jean McGuire, a former assistant commissioner of health in Massachusetts, who also was formerly the head of the state-run HIV/AIDS bureau here. Current state health officials could not be reached for comment.
McGuire, a professor of public health at Northeastern University, said the state previously had maintained confidentiality of HIV/AIDS patient records through a complex coding system.
She said the state agency was compelled to shift to name-based reporting because the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention demanded uniform criteria. More than 40 states, including California, require HIV reporting by name.
Current drug protocols allow many HIV/AIDS patients to live with the disease for many years, and McGuire said many people were worried about stigmatization and the possibility of unwanted disclosure if their names were listed in government databanks.
"I think this is an unfortunate decision," she said. "For me, there has always been an overriding concern about the fact that we are constantly and consistently expanding the personally identifying data that the government has."
But a spokesman for the San Francisco AIDS Foundation said named-based reporting is "good public health."
Redge Norton, the foundation's media relations manager, said Tuesday that "routinizing and universalizing HIV testing and information helps people get into care. Twenty-five years into the epidemic, it makes sense. Being HIV-positive does not have to be a death sentence."
Norton said California and other states that practice name-based reporting had built informational firewalls to help protect confidentiality.
061115
LT061105
Copyright © 2006 - Los Angeles Times. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission. Reproduction of this article (other than one copy for personal reference) must be cleared through the Los Angeles Times, Permissions, Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90053. http://www.latimes.com.
AEGiS is a 501(c)3, not-for-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation. AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted funding from Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS, Elton John AIDS Foundation, the National Library of Medicine, Pacific Life Foundation and donations from users like you.
Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 2006. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.
AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.
Copyright ©1980, 2006. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .