Los Angeles Times, Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90053 - THURSDAY May 16, 1996 Edition: Home Edition Page: 11 Pt. A Word Count: 530
Norman Kempster; Times Staff Writer

The White House said that Clinton would veto the bill unless it is toned down in the Senate.

The bill, approved by a 272-153 vote that largely followed party lines, would add $13 billion to Clinton's budget request for the Defense Department, most of it for additional aircraft, ships, submarines, tanks and precision-guided munitions that the Pentagon says are not needed, at least not now.

The Senate version of the bill, approved earlier this month by the Armed Services Committee, also authorizes $267 billion in spending but either rejects or ignores most of the controversial social issues contained in the House measure.

With both the House and Senate measures authorizing $13 billion increases in the Pentagon budget, Congress has drawn a vivid line between the defense policies of the White House and the Republican-led Congress.

Republicans, joined by about one-third of the Democrats in the House, rejected Clinton's plan to reduce total defense spending by about $10 billion during the fiscal year that starts next Oct. 1. They argued that the administration was trying to cut too deeply into the country's post-Cold War military capacity.

Although the House bill is about $3 billion higher than the current year's budget, it amounts to a 1.5% reduction when the numbers are adjusted for inflation.

In its report on the bill, the House International Relations Committee warned that the nation faces threats from China and an increasingly unstable Russia as well as rogue nations like Iran and North Korea. The committee said that the United States must be prepared to cope with ethnic violence in such places as Bosnia and Somalia.

"The Russia of today is not the Russia of 1992," said Rep. Gerald B. H. Solomon (R-N.Y.). "The reformers of that country have long since been purged."

But the House clouded the fiscal debate between the White House and Capitol Hill by approving a string of social provisions, many of them sponsored by Rep. Robert K. Dornan (R-Garden Grove), that give Clinton ample reason to veto the legislation without having to address the spending priorities.

The bill would reverse Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" policy of allowing homosexuals to serve in uniform provided they keep quiet about their sexual orientation, by reinstating a flat ban on gay troops. It would require the services to discharge personnel infected with the AIDS virus. And it would prohibit post exchanges and other on-base stores from selling Playboy, Penthouse and other publications containing "sexually explicit material."

The measure also would renew a provision, contained in previous defense authorization bills, prohibiting overseas military hospitals from performing abortions, except in cases of rape or incest or when the mother's life is at stake.

The Senate committee's version of the bill does not address the issue of gays in the military or the sale of sex magazines.

The Senate bill would also restrict abortion in military hospitals.

Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1996. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 1996. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .